Hey all again,
Looking into a few other options. How about infiniband? it would give us more
bandwidth, but will it increase complexity/price? any thoughts?
Cheers
Mark
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-disc
Depending on what hardware you have and what size the data chunks are
will determine what impact IPsec will have. WAN vs LAN isn't the issue.
As for mitigating the impact of the crypto in IPsec it depends on the
data size. If the size of the packets is > 512 bytes then the crypto
framework wi
hi,
Few questions, I seem to remember in WAN environments IPsec can have a
reasonably large performance impact, how large is this performance impact? and
is there soe way to mitigate it? The problem is we could be needing to use all
a gigbit links bandwidth (possibly more). is IPsec AH slightly
Mark wrote:
> Ok, had a bit of a look around,
>
> What about this setup.
>
> Two boxes with all the hard drives in them. And all drives iSCSI Targets. A
> third Box puts all of the Drives into a mirrored RAIDz setup (one box
> mirroring the other, each has a RAIDz zfs zpool). This setup wil be
Ok, had a bit of a look around,
What about this setup.
Two boxes with all the hard drives in them. And all drives iSCSI Targets. A
third Box puts all of the Drives into a mirrored RAIDz setup (one box mirroring
the other, each has a RAIDz zfs zpool). This setup wil be shared via samba out.
Doe
Hello Ralf,
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 8:55:35 AM, you wrote:
RR> instead, or, most important for the typical data center, the *operator*
RR> is not able to replace a disk like he's used to: pulling the old disc
RR> out, putting the new disc in, resync starting, finished. You'll always
RR> have
Ralf Ramge wrote:
> I consider this a big design flaw of ZFS.
Are you saying that it's a design flaw of ZFS that we haven't yet implemented
remote replication? I would consider that a missing feature, not a design
flaw. There's nothing in the design of ZFS to prevent such a feature (and in
fa
Ralf,
> Well, and what I want to say: if you place the bitmap volume on the
> same
> disk, this situation even gets worse. The problem is the
> involvement of
> SVM. Building the soft partition again makes the handling even more
> complex and the case harder to handle for operators. It's the b
Wow,
I just opened a whole can of worms there that went flying over my head. Thanks
for all the information! i'll see if i can plough through it all :)
I'm guessing that i might be able to do asynchronous, but the problem is that
the video is going to be streaming from a camera in real time. An
Jim Dunham wrote:
> This is just one scenario for deploying the 48 disks of x4500. The
> blog listed below offers another option, by mirroring the bitmaps
> across all available disks, bring the total disk count back up to 46,
> (or 44, if 2x HSP) leaving the other two for a mirrored root disk.
Ralf,
> Torrey McMahon wrote:
>> AVS?
>>
> Jim Dunham will probably shoot me, or worse, but I recommend thinking
> twice about using AVS for ZFS replication.
That's is why the call this a discussion group, as it encourages
differing opinions,
> Basically, you only have a
> few options:
>
> 1)
Torrey McMahon wrote:
> AVS?
>
Jim Dunham will probably shoot me, or worse, but I recommend thinking
twice about using AVS for ZFS replication. Basically, you only have a
few options:
1) Using a battery buffered hardware RAID controller, which leads to
bad ZFS performance in many cases,
2)
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 05:45:18PM -0700, Mark wrote:
> Basically, the setup is a large volume of Hi-Def video is being streamed
> from a camera, onto an editing timeline. This will be written to a
> network share. Due to the large amounts of data, ZFS is a really good
> option for us. But we need
Mark wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Im just wondering (i figure you can do this but dont know what hardware and
> stuff i would need) if I can set up a mirror of a raidz zpool across a
> network.
>
> Basically, the setup is a large volume of Hi-Def video is being streamed from
> a camera, onto an editing
Hi All,
Im just wondering (i figure you can do this but dont know what hardware and
stuff i would need) if I can set up a mirror of a raidz zpool across a network.
Basically, the setup is a large volume of Hi-Def video is being streamed from a
camera, onto an editing timeline. This will be writ
15 matches
Mail list logo
