This missed the group!
-- Forwarded message --
From: BVK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 8, 2007 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Mac OS X Leopard to use ZFS
To: Rick Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/8/07, Rick Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hoping for L4, myself.
Though
On 6/8/07, Toby Thain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When should we expect Solaris kernel under OS X? 10.6? 10.7? :-)
I think its quite possible. I believe, very soon they will ditch their
Mach based (?) BSD and switch to solaris.
File based CDDL license seems like a right choice to a company
Starfox wrote:
None of the scripts that I looked at seemed to
offered any sort of error recovery. I think I'll be
able to use this as a starting point (and maybe the
man pages can be updated to include that you can use
any common snapshot to send -i - that fact is not
obvious to those
On 08/06/07, BVK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/07, Toby Thain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When should we expect Solaris kernel under OS X? 10.6? 10.7? :-)
I think its quite possible. I believe, very soon they will ditch their
Mach based (?) BSD and switch to solaris.
I think that's
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
On 8-Jun-07, at 3:13 AM, BVK wrote:
On 6/8/07, Toby Thain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When should we expect Solaris kernel under OS X? 10.6? 10.7? :-)
I think its quite possible. I believe, very soon they will ditch their
Mach based (?) BSD and switch
Graham Perrin wrote:
We have irc://irc.freenode.net/solaris
and irc://irc.freenode.net/opensolaris
and the other channels listed at
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/entry/opensolaris_on_irc
AND growing discussion of ZFS in Mac- 'FUSE- and Linux-oriented channels
BUT unless I'm missing something,
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, BVK wrote:
File based CDDL license seems like a right choice to a company like
Apple. My only worry is, Apple never works in open, so their
improvements may never get back into the community.
But that can't happen (to files that Apple modifies at least): the
CDDL dictates
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:51:17AM -0700, J?rgen Keil wrote:
You are right... I shouldn't post in the middle of
the night... nForce chipsets don't support AHCI.
Btw. does anybody have a status update for bug 6296435,
native sata driver needed for nVIDIA mcp04 and mcp55 controllers
I only see 15 disks in your CM stacker.
I designed and built a system for work with the CMStacker and relocated the
power and IO panel from the top slot to the side cover (where the spot for a
small fan is) and it works great. A single Seasonic 600AS powers the entire
system nicely with PF
1. ZFS atomic operation that commits data.
2. Writes come into the app.
3. The db put in hotbackup mode.
4. Snapshot taken on storage.
5. ZFS atomic operation that commits data.
So if i do a snap restore, ZFS might revert to point1, but from the db
perspective, it is inconsistent and we
1. ZFS atomic operation that commits data.
2. Writes come into the app.
3. The db put in hotbackup mode.
4. Snapshot taken on storage.
5. ZFS atomic operation that commits data.
So if i do a snap restore, ZFS might revert to point1, but from the db=
perspective, it is
Thanks Darren, so a sync should do the job for me in that case. How about
locking the FS so that i dont miss any new writes further on?.
Anything similar to lockfs?.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Did we ever get a reply to this?,
As somebody mentioned, the generic answer was use ZFS, but i never got to
know how. I havent tried it myself but i was curious to know since i will be
implementing ZFS shortly.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hi Eric,
Is zfs dynamic lun expansion possible now?.
thanks!
Ganes
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Thanks Darren, so a sync should do the job for me in that case. How
about locking the FS so that i dont miss any new writes further on?.
I'm not sure I understand what you might miss here. Normally you'd ask
your application to make itself consistent, take a snapshot, then when
the snapshot
15 matches
Mail list logo
