The regular mount/umount commands can only be used if you have the
filesystems present in /etc/vfstab. To create a zfs filesystem with
the idea of using mount/umount you must specify 'mountpoint=legacy'.
Now you can 'mount /d/d5' ... as per regular ufs.
Zpools don't need mountpoints ... ie 'mount
Krzys wrote:
> hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont
> know how to fix...
>
> I had a pool of two drives:
>
> bash-3.00# zpool status
>pool: mypool
> state: ONLINE
> scrub: none requested
> config:
>
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CK
On 10/30/07, Joe Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm also very interested in getting this going, it's frustrating having Apple
> ignore what a big selling point for Leopard this is!
>
Check out the Mac blogosphere. I think Apple's waiting until ZFS's
got a few more things ironed out. The
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
> I'm curious if the capacity of this pool is 128mb x 3? If so, then I
> think you could replace the emcpower2a with a 128mb file.
That's a great idea. You could do it even if the other two aren't 128mb -
you can always replace a device/file as long
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I agree that your best bet is to replace the 128-mb device with
> another device, fix the emcpower2a manually, and then replace it
> back. I don't know these drives at all, so I'm unclear about the
> fix it manually step.
>
> Because your pool isn't redundant,
Hi,
I have the same sil3114 based controller, installed in a dual Opteron box. I
have installed Solaris x86 and have had no problem with it, however I hardly
used that box with Solaris as my installation was only to try out Solaris on my
Opteron worksation. Instead, on that workstation I consta
Chris,
I agree that your best bet is to replace the 128-mb device with
another device, fix the emcpower2a manually, and then replace it
back. I don't know these drives at all, so I'm unclear about the
fix it manually step.
Because your pool isn't redundant, you can't use zpool offline
or detach.
It would be nice to be able to mount zfs file system by its mountpoit also and
not just by the pool... For example I have the following:
mypool5 257G 199G 24.5K /mypool5
mypool5/d5 257G 199G 257G /d/d5
Tried that... completely different cases with different power supplies.
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Al Hopper wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, MC wrote:
>
>>> Here's what I've done so far:
>>
>> The obvious thing to test is the drive controller, so maybe you
>> should do that :)
>>
>
> Also - wh
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, MC wrote:
>> Here's what I've done so far:
>
> The obvious thing to test is the drive controller, so maybe you should do
> that :)
>
Also - while you're doing swapTronics - don't forget the Power Supply
(PSU). Ensure that your PSU has sufficient capacity on its 12Volt
rai
To answer a number of questions:
Regarding different controllers, I've tried 2 Syba Sil 3114 controllers
purchased about 4 months apart. I've tried 5.4.3 firmware with one and 5.4.13
with another. Maybe Syba makes crappy Sil 3114 cards but it's the same one
that someone on blogs.sun.com used
yes, I was thinking about this but I wanted to just remove the whole 128mb disk
and then use format to repartition this complete disk to give it full
capacity... I have all the disks setup this way so I wanted to be consistent
with it but its not letting remove that disk at all from the pool...1
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Krzys wrote:
>
> everything is great but I've made a mistake and I would like to remove
> emcpower2a from my pool and I cannot do that...
>
> Well the mistake that I made is that I did not format my device
> correctly so instead of adding 125gig I added 128meg
You can't remo
I'm also very interested in getting this going, it's frustrating having Apple
ignore what a big selling point for Leopard this is!
Kugutsum, could you drop me a line so we can discuss? joe (at) penski {dot} net
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On 10/30/07, Neal Pollack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm experiencing major checksum errors when using a syba silicon image 3114
>>> based pci sata controller w/ nonraid firmware. I've tested by copying data
>>> via sftp and smb. With everything I
One thing to check before you blame your controller:
Are the SATA cables close together for an extended length?
Basically, most SATA cables will generate massive levels of cross-talk between
them if they're tied together or a run parallel in close proximity for a part
of
their run-leng
On 10/30/07, Neal Pollack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm experiencing major checksum errors when using a syba silicon image 3114
> > based pci sata controller w/ nonraid firmware. I've tested by copying data
> > via sftp and smb. With everything I've swapped out, I can't fathom this
> > be
And are you seeing any error messages in '/var/adm/messages'
indicating any failure on the disk controller card?
If so, please post a sample back here to the forum.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@open
First off, can we just confirm the exact version of the Silicon Image Card
and which driver Solaris is using.
Use 'prtconf -pv' and '/usr/X11/bin/scanpci'
to get the PCI vendor & device ID information.
Use 'prtconf -D' to confirm which drivers are being used by which devices.
And 'modinfo' will
On 29/10/2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I created a ZFS file system like the following with /mypool/cache being
> the partition for the Squid cache:
>
> 18:51:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ zfs list
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> mypool 478
Hello zfs-discuss,
http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/mysql-zfs.html
I've just quickly glanced thru it.
However the argument about double buffering problem is not valid.
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
