Is it possible to migrate data from iscsitgt for comstar iscsi target? I guess
comstar wants metadata at beginning of volume and this makes things difficult?
Yours
Markus Kovero
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 20 Sep 2009, at 19:46, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 11:41 -0700, vattini giacomo wrote:
Hi there,i'm in a bad situation,under Ubuntu i was tring to import
a solaris zpool that is in /dev/sda1,while the Ubuntu is in /dev/
sda5;not being able to mount the solaris pool i
Hi all, I have a RAID-Z2 setup with 6x 500Gb SATA disks. I exported the
array to use under a different system but during or after the export one of
the disks failed:
k...@localhost:~$ pfexec zpool import
pool: chronicle
id: 11592382930413748377
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices
On Sep 21, 2009, at 06:52, Chris Ridd wrote:
Does zpool destroy prompt are you sure in any way? Some admin
tools do (beadm destroy for example) but there's not a lot of
consistency.
No it doesn't, which I always found strange.
Personally I always thought you should be queried for a zfs
The disk has since been replaced, so now:
k...@localhost:~$ pfexec zpool import
pool: chronicle
id: 11592382930413748377
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices contains corrupted data.
action: The pool can be imported despite missing or damaged devices. The
fault tolerance
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 13:34, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 06:52, Chris Ridd wrote:
Does zpool destroy prompt are you sure in any way? Some admin tools do
(beadm destroy for example) but there's not a lot of consistency.
No it doesn't, which I always found
Hi All,
out of curiosity: Can anyone come up with a good idea about why my snv_111
laptop computer should run more than 1000 zil_clean threads?
ff0009a9dc60 fbc2c0300 tq:zil_clean
ff0009aa3c60 fbc2c0300 tq:zil_clean
ff0009aa9c60
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:31:57 -0400
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are just building a cache, why not just make a file system and
put a reservation on it? Turn off auto snapshots and set other
features as per best practices for your workload? In other words,
treat it
Nils,
A zil_clean() is started for each dataset after every txg.
this includes snapshots (which is perhaps a bit inefficient).
Still, zil_clean() is fairly lightweight if there's nothing
to do (grab a non contended lock; find nothing on a list;
drop the lock exit).
Neil.
On 09/21/09 08:08,
Hi Darren,
sorry that it took so long before I could answer.
The good thing:
I found out what went wrong.
What I did:
After resizing a Disk on the Storage, solaris recognizes it immediately.
Everytime you resize a disk, the EVA storage updates the discription which
contains the size. So typing
On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Sascha wrote:
Hi Darren,
sorry that it took so long before I could answer.
The good thing:
I found out what went wrong.
What I did:
After resizing a Disk on the Storage, solaris recognizes it
immediately.
Everytime you resize a disk, the EVA storage updates the
Frank Middleton wrote:
The problem with the regular stream is that most of the file
system properties (such as mountpoint) are not copied as they
are with a recursive stream. This may seem an advantage to some,
(e.g., if the remote mountpoint is already in use, the mountpoint
seems to default to
Hej Richard.
think I'll update all our servers to the same version of zfs...
That will hopefully make sure that this doesn't happen again :-)
Darren and Richard: Thank you very much for your help !
Sascha
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Thinking more about this I'm confused about what you are seeing.
The function dsl_pool_zil_clean() will serialise separate calls to
zil_clean() within a pool. I don't expect you have 1037 pools on your laptop!
So I don't know what's going on. What is the typical call stack for those
zil_clean()
Tristan Ball wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have a couple of systems running opensolaris b118, one of which sends
hourly snapshots to the other. This has been working well, however as of
today, the receiving zfs process has started running extremely slowly,
and is running at 100% CPU on one core,
Hi,
I've got some strange problems with my serer today.
When I boot b123, it stops at reading zfs config. I've tried several
times to get past this point, but it seems to freeze there.
Then I tried single user mode, from GRUB, and it seems to get me a
little further.
After a few minutes however,
It appears as though zfs reports the size of a directory to be one byte per
file. Traditional file systems such as ufs or ext3 report the actual size of
the data needed to store the directory.
This causes some trouble with the default behavior of some nfs clients
(linux) to decide to to use a
On 21 September, 2009 - Chris Banal sent me these 4,4K bytes:
It appears as though zfs reports the size of a directory to be one byte per
file. Traditional file systems such as ufs or ext3 report the actual size of
the data needed to store the directory.
Or rather, the size needed at some
On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:31:57 -0400
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are just building a cache, why not just make a file system and
put a reservation on it? Turn off auto snapshots and set other
features as per best
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:51:52PM -0400, Steffen Weiberle wrote:
I am trying to compile some deployment scenarios of ZFS.
# of systems
One, our e-mail server for the entire campus.
amount of storage
2 TB that's 58% used.
application profile(s)
This is our Cyrus IMAP spool. In addition
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:13:26 -0400
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, so the problem you are trying to solve is how much stuff can I
place in the remaining free space? I don't think this is knowable
for a dynamic file system like ZFS where metadata is dynamically
allocated.
I was able to get Netatalk built on OpenSolaris for my ZFS NAS at home.
Everything is running great so far, and I'm planning on using it on the 96TB
NAS I'm building for my office. It would be nice to have this supported out of
the box, but there are probably licensing issues involved.
--
This
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:37 AM, casper@sun.com wrote:
The disk has since been replaced, so now:
k...@localhost:~$ pfexec zpool import
pool: chronicle
id: 11592382930413748377
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices contains corrupted data.
action: The pool can be
I'm running vanilla 2009.06 since its release. I'll definitely give it a
shot with the Live CD.
Also I tried importing with only the five good disks physically attached and
get the same message.
- Kyle
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Chris Murray
chrismurra...@googlemail.comwrote:
That
Recently upgraded a system from b98 to b114. Also replaced two 400G
Seagate Barracudea 7200.8 SATA disks with two WD 750G RE3 SATA disks
from a 6-device raidz1 pool. Replacing the first 750G went ok. While
replacing the second 750G disk, I noticed CKSUM errors on the first
disk. Once the second
25 matches
Mail list logo
