that are required so you should
read the whole thing.
The details on using RAID for the boot drive start on page 31 of chapter 3.
There are also some useful documents on sunsolve.sun.com that a quick
search should turn up.
Regards
-Mark D.
James C. McPherson wrote:
Malahat Qureshi wrote:
Is anyone
--
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
The following is the delegated admin model that Matt and I have been
working on. At this point we are ready for your feedback on the
proposed model.
-Mark
PERMISSION GRANTING
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Bill La Forge wrote:
I like to think of delegation as being a bit different than granting
permision--in fact, as a special permission that may include counts.
For example, you might delegate to a manager the ability
/tape.c#1324
-Mark
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
sometime in August.
-Mark
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
on releasing the patch sometime in August.
Mark,
do you know if this is for 7.3 or will it work for 7.2 too??
we are still using 7.2 and have no plan to update to 7.3 yet...
I believe it is for 7.3. Tim Foster actually did the testing of it.
right now we doing snapshots and send to tar-tape
Bart Smaalders wrote:
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:44:28AM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote:
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
PERMISSION GRANTING
zfs allow -c ability[,ability...] dataset
-c Create means that the permission will be granted (Locally) to the
creator on any newly
Glenn Skinner wrote:
The following is a nit-level comment, so I've directed it onl;y to you,
rather than to the entire list.
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:57:35 -0600
From: Mark Shellenbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [zfs-discuss] Proposal: delegated administration
The following
James Dickens wrote:
On 7/17/06, Mark Shellenbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following is the delegated admin model that Matt and I have been
working on. At this point we are ready for your feedback on the
proposed model.
-Mark
PERMISSION GRANTING
zfs allow [-l] [-d
-Mark
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
, but no threads
to process them. The fact that we don't have the threads is related to
the bug that Tabriz is working on.
-Mark
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
need to modify any
file system code.
Access checking for chown/chgrp/utime/... aka VOP_SETATTR() goes through
a different flavor of secpolicy functions.
-Mark
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
other processes trying to get memory.
-Mark
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
Simple test 'ptime find /zfs/filesystem /dev/null' with 2GB RAM.
After second, third, etc. time still it reads a lot from disks while
find is running (atime is off).
on x64 (Opteron) it doesn't.
I
to be very careful about changing the rules for access control,
since you may end up breaking POSIX compliance.
-Mark
Johannes
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mark Shellenbaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mi 21.06.2006 21:21
An: Nicolai Johannes
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; zfs
tasks, such as create, destroy, clone,
changing properties and so on.
After the zfs team is in agreement as to what the interfaces should be,
I will forward it to zfs-discuss for further feedback.
-Mark
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
501 - 515 of 515 matches
Mail list logo
