spot for This pool was not unmounted cleanly due
to a hardware fault and data has been lost. The name of timestamp
line contains the date which can be recovered to. Use the command
# zfs reframbulocate this that -t timestamp
to revert to timestamp
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown
, much less Infinite) c-b
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
dav...@sun.com | -- Mark Twain
cell: (647) 833-9377, bridge: (877) 385-4099 code: 506 9191
://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
dav...@sun.com | -- Mark Twain
cell: (647) 833-9377, bridge: (877) 385-4099
folks
find it on?
--dave (an external consultant, these days) c-b
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
dav...@sun.com | -- Mark Twain
cell: (647) 833-9377
also had to narrow a stripe
for the particular load being discussed...
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain
cell: (647
, back when I was an
employee.
--dave (who's a contractor) c-b
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain
cell: (647) 833-9377
Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain
cell: (647) 833-9377, bridge: (877) 385-4099 code: 506 9191
(at home) c-b
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain
cell: (647) 833-9377, bridge: (877) 385-4099 code: 506 9191
/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto
://milek.blogspot.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do
.
***
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
[EMAIL
important
consideration IMO. :-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do
as the checksum algorithm would be much more
interesting. I'm going to try that now and see how it compares with
fletcher2 for a small contrived test.
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
.
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain
(905) 943-1983, cell: (647) 833-9377, (800) 555-9786 x56583
bridge: (877) 385-4099
David Collier-Brown wrote:
ZFS copy-on-write results in tables' contents being spread across
the full width of their stripe, which is arguably a good thing
for transaction processing performance (or at least can be), but
makes sequential table-scan speed degrade.
If you're doing
, I'm also volunteering to
help provide it: I'm not a storage or ZFS guy, but I am an author,
and will happily help my Smarter Colleagues[tm] to write it up.
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
workload without
cutting into performance.
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain
(905) 943-1983, cell: (647) 833-9377, (800
We've discussed this in considerable detail, but the original
question remains unanswered: if an organization *must* use
multiple pools, is there an upper bound to avoid or a rate
of degradation to be considered?
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown| Always do right. This will gratify
18 matches
Mail list logo