Ok, thanx for your input, guys. So Bvians comment still is valid. I tell the
Linux guys that OpenSolaris on 32 bit will fragment the memory to the point
that you have to reboot once in a while. It shouldnt corrupt your data when it
runs out of RAM.
Vodevick.
--
This message posted from
Ok, thanx for your input, guys. So Bvians comment still is valid. I
tell the Linux guys that Open Solaris on 32 bit will fragment the
memory to the point that you have to reboot once in a while. It
shouldnt corrupt your data when it runs out of RAM.
I'm not sure that that is completely true;
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that that is completely true; I've run a small 32-bit file server
and it ran for half a year or more (except when I wanted to upgrade)
But that system had only 512 MB memory and I made the kernel's VA bigger
than the 512
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:39:45AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, thanx for your input, guys. So Bvians comment still is valid. I
tell the Linux guys that Open Solaris on 32 bit will fragment the
memory to the point that you have to reboot once in a while. It
shouldnt corrupt your data
But it is a problem when you more memory then you can map (1GB will
probably still work but 2GB is too big.
This here is my problem. I've got 4GB of RAM in the box. It's painful. ;)
Have you changed kernelbase? Lowering it will help performance.
Casper
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out Solaris + ZFS
and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell them? That it is not fixed?
That they have reboot every week? Someone knows?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 6-Dec-08, at 7:10 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
them? That it is not fixed? That they have reboot every week?
Someone knows?
That it's not recommended for
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Toby Thain wrote:
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
them? That it is not fixed? That they have reboot every week?
Someone knows?
That it's
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Brian Hechinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Toby Thain wrote:
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
them? That it is
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:42:44PM -0600, Tim wrote:
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern
Sounds to me like they want to try out solaris + zfs, not zfs on fuse.
Ooops, misread what he said. Sorry about that.
I suppose my original comment still stands then. :)
-brian
--
Coding in C is like
Does PAE help things at all on 32-bit ?
Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:42:44PM -0600, Tim wrote:
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern
Sounds to me like they want to try out solaris + zfs, not zfs on fuse.
Ooops, misread what he said. Sorry about that.
I
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:36:35PM -0800, Joseph Mocker wrote:
Does PAE help things at all on 32-bit ?
No.
-brian
--
Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta
tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of
pop tarts and pancake mix. -- IRC
I see this old post about ZFS fragmenting the RAM if it is 32 bit. This makes
the memory run out. Is it still true, or has it been fixed?
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-July/003506.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:35:27AM -0800, Orvar Korvar wrote:
I see this old post about ZFS fragmenting the RAM if it is 32 bit. This makes
the memory run out. Is it still true, or has it been fixed?
Don't waste your time trying to run ZFS on a 32-bit machine. The performance
is horrible. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
