On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:22 , Ian Collins wrote:
On 09/14/11 08:49 PM, Sami Ketola wrote:
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 , Peter Tribble wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Hensonhen...@acm.org wrote:
I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining
about installing
On 09/14/11 08:49 PM, Sami Ketola wrote:
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 , Peter Tribble wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Hensonhen...@acm.org wrote:
I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining
about installing a kernel patch and suddenly having his ACL's
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining
about installing a kernel patch and suddenly having his ACL's disappear
completely whenever a chmod occurred. I replied and asked him to check
if the
On 9/13/2011 5:07 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
Patch-ID# 144500-19 is the kernel update that is the kernel from
10U10
Yep, the guy posting on sunmanagers confirmed that was the patch he
installed which broke aclmode.
Did update 10 sneak out under cover of darkness or what? I didn't see
any
On 9/13/2011 5:21 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
Update 10 has been out for about 3 weeks.
Where was any announcement posted? I haven't heard anything about it. As
far as I can tell, the Oracle site still only has update 9 available for
download:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
On 9/13/2011 5:21 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
Update 10 has been out for about 3 weeks.
Where was any announcement posted? I haven't heard anything about it. As far
as I can tell, the Oracle site still only has update 9
On 9/13/2011 12:46 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
Hm. They updated that a few weeks ago with a new release but you're right,
it's now back to S10U9. Which leaves me with a whole slew of boxes running
a release that doesn't exist.
Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 s10x_u10wos_17a X86
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
Did update 10 sneak out under cover of darkness or what? I didn't see
any announcements or chatter about it, google doesn't find anything, and
the Oracle download site still only shows update 9:
It was supposed to be
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:41:36PM -0700, Ian Collins wrote:
Not work on what way?
I have a client who makes extensive (more like excessive!) use of ACLs
on ZFS and we don't see any problems. Other than the ridiculous
complexity of some of the ACLs that have grown over time.
From my
[...]
He already opened a support ticket, they responded:
-
ZFS appears to be the only file system supporting NFSv4 ACLs
that attempts to preserve ACLs during chmod(2) operations.
Unfortunately, this requires the ACL to be modified in ways that are
confusing to customers and the
10 matches
Mail list logo
