Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Scott Laird
I have an Asus P5K WS motherboard with a cheap Core 2 Duo CPU (E2140,
$70 or so) and one of the cheap SuperMicro 8-port PCI-X SATA cards.
That gives you 14 supported SATA ports.  Throw 4 GB of RAM into it
(~$100) and then either use 500 GB or 750 GB drives.  One of the
Seagate 750s is down to $155 this week, which puts it close enough to
the 500s ($90-120) that it might be worth considering.  I threw
everything into a Lian Li PC-V2000A Plus II case, which is kind of
pricy (compared to cheap PC cases, not compared to STK hardware :-)
but holds 12 drives without any problem at all, and 20 drives with a
bit of extra hardware.  Before drives, the whole system's well under
$1k, and it's been working perfectly for months now.

I'm using raidz2 across 8 drives, but if I had it to do again, I'd
probably just use mirroring.  Unfortunately, raidz2 kills your random
read and write performance, and that makes Time Machine really, really
slow.  I'm running low on space now, and considering throwing another
8 drives into the case in the spring, if I can find a cheap 8-port
PCI-E SATA CARD.  When that happens, I'll probably try to convert
everything to mirroring.


Scott

On Jan 14, 2008 8:33 AM, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm sure this has been asked many times and though a quick search didn't 
 reveal anything illuminating, I'll post regardless.

 I am looking to make a storage system available on my home network. I need 
 storage space in the order of terabytes as I have a growing iTunes collection 
 and tons of MP3s that I converted from vinyl. At this time I am unsure of the 
 growth rate, but I suppose it isn't unreasonable to look for 4TB usable 
 storage. Since I will not be backing this up, I think I want RAIDZ2.

 Since this is for home use, I don't want to spend an inordinate amount of 
 money. I did look at the cheaper STK arrays, but they're more than what I 
 want to pay, so I am thinking that puts me in the white-box market. Power 
 consumption would be nice to keep low also.

 I don't really care if it's external or internal disks. Even though I don't 
 want to get completely skinned over the money, I also don't want to buy 
 something that is unreliable.

 I am very interested as to your thoughts and experiences on this. E.g. what 
 to buy, what to stay away from.

 Thanks in advance!


 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Alex
Thanks a bunch! I'll look into this very config. Just one Q, where did you get 
the case?
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Scott Laird
Everything except the SuperMicro SATA card came from Newegg.  They
didn't have the card in stock at the time, so I ordered it from
buy.com.


Scott

On Jan 14, 2008 9:33 AM, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks a bunch! I'll look into this very config. Just one Q, where did you 
 get the case?



 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Scott Laird
Run 'defaults write com.apple.systempreferences
TMShowUnsupportedNetworkVolumes 1' as root.  I've been using it since
November without problems, but I haven't actually had to restore
anything in anger yet.

There's a rumor that Apple will be officially adding network support
to Time Machine this week, but who knows.


Scott

On Jan 14, 2008 9:40 AM, Arne Schwabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Scott Laird schrieb:
  I have an Asus P5K WS motherboard with a cheap Core 2 Duo CPU (E2140,
  $70 or so) and one of the cheap SuperMicro 8-port PCI-X SATA cards.
  That gives you 14 supported SATA ports.  Throw 4 GB of RAM into it
  (~$100) and then either use 500 GB or 750 GB drives.  One of the
  Seagate 750s is down to $155 this week, which puts it close enough to
  the 500s ($90-120) that it might be worth considering.  I threw
  everything into a Lian Li PC-V2000A Plus II case, which is kind of
  pricy (compared to cheap PC cases, not compared to STK hardware :-)
  but holds 12 drives without any problem at all, and 20 drives with a
  bit of extra hardware.  Before drives, the whole system's well under
  $1k, and it's been working perfectly for months now.
 
  I'm using raidz2 across 8 drives, but if I had it to do again, I'd
  probably just use mirroring.  Unfortunately, raidz2 kills your random
  read and write performance, and that makes Time Machine really, really
  slow.  I'm running low on space now, and considering throwing another
  8 drives into the case in the spring, if I can find a cheap 8-port
  PCI-E SATA CARD.  When that happens, I'll probably try to convert
  everything to mirroring.
 
 
 Just a question how did you make time machine work on a network drive?

 Arne

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Brian Hechinger
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:52:38AM -0800, Scott Laird wrote:
 Run 'defaults write com.apple.systempreferences
 TMShowUnsupportedNetworkVolumes 1' as root.  I've been using it since
 November without problems, but I haven't actually had to restore
 anything in anger yet.

I couldn't get that to work with NFS shares, has anyone else?

-brian
-- 
Perl can be fast and elegant as much as J2EE can be fast and elegant.
In the hands of a skilled artisan, it can and does happen; it's just
that most of the shit out there is built by people who'd be better
suited to making sure that my burger is cooked thoroughly.  -- Jonathan 
Patschke
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Scott Laird
I'm using smb.  Mount the share via the finder, then go to the time
machine pref pane, and it should show up.


Scott

On Jan 14, 2008 10:03 AM, Brian Hechinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:52:38AM -0800, Scott Laird wrote:
  Run 'defaults write com.apple.systempreferences
  TMShowUnsupportedNetworkVolumes 1' as root.  I've been using it since
  November without problems, but I haven't actually had to restore
  anything in anger yet.

 I couldn't get that to work with NFS shares, has anyone else?

 -brian
 --
 Perl can be fast and elegant as much as J2EE can be fast and elegant.
 In the hands of a skilled artisan, it can and does happen; it's just
 that most of the shit out there is built by people who'd be better
 suited to making sure that my burger is cooked thoroughly.  -- Jonathan 
 Patschke

 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Brian Hechinger
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:10:26AM -0800, Scott Laird wrote:
 I'm using smb.  Mount the share via the finder, then go to the time
 machine pref pane, and it should show up.

I guess it's time to setup SAMBA then. :)

Thanks!

I've been wanting to backup the mini and the macbook to the fileserver
ever since I saw Time Machine.

I can't wait to get home now  ;)

-brian
-- 
Perl can be fast and elegant as much as J2EE can be fast and elegant.
In the hands of a skilled artisan, it can and does happen; it's just
that most of the shit out there is built by people who'd be better
suited to making sure that my burger is cooked thoroughly.  -- Jonathan 
Patschke
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Jonathan Loran

Alex,

I imagine that you've spent/will spend dozens or perhaps hundreds of 
hours ripping your MP3's.  Don't even think about skipping backups.   
Budget in the cost of backups, preferably off site backups, even 
something you can carry to work and lock in your desk.  Buy a four drive 
USB enclosure and 4 1TB drives.  That would work.  As reliable as zfs 
is, there's no technological fix for natural disasters, or human error.  
My 2 cents.

Jon

Alex wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm sure this has been asked many times and though a quick search didn't 
 reveal anything illuminating, I'll post regardless.

 I am looking to make a storage system available on my home network. I need 
 storage space in the order of terabytes as I have a growing iTunes collection 
 and tons of MP3s that I converted from vinyl. At this time I am unsure of the 
 growth rate, but I suppose it isn't unreasonable to look for 4TB usable 
 storage. Since I will not be backing this up, I think I want RAIDZ2.

 Since this is for home use, I don't want to spend an inordinate amount of 
 money. I did look at the cheaper STK arrays, but they're more than what I 
 want to pay, so I am thinking that puts me in the white-box market. Power 
 consumption would be nice to keep low also.

 I don't really care if it's external or internal disks. Even though I don't 
 want to get completely skinned over the money, I also don't want to buy 
 something that is unreliable.

 I am very interested as to your thoughts and experiences on this. E.g. what 
 to buy, what to stay away from.

 Thanks in advance!
  
  
 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
   

-- 


- _/ _/  /   - Jonathan Loran -   -
-/  /   /IT Manager   -
-  _  /   _  / / Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley
-/  / /  (510) 643-5146 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- __/__/__/   AST:7731^29u18e3
 


___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Tim Cook
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?p=AOC-SAT2MVc=frpid=84b59337aa4414aa488fdf95dfd0de1a1e2a21528d6d2fbf89732c9ed77b72a4

^^that was the best price I could find when looking 6 months ago.  Dunno if 
that's changed since.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Tim Cook
www.mozy.com appears to have unlimited backups for 4.95 a month.  Hard to beat 
that.  And they're owned by EMC now so you know they aren't going anywhere 
anytime soon.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Cyril Plisko
On Jan 14, 2008 7:02 PM, Scott Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have an Asus P5K WS motherboard with a cheap Core 2 Duo CPU (E2140,
 $70 or so) and one of the cheap SuperMicro 8-port PCI-X SATA cards.


I went for Celeron 420 (around $35) - with ZFS compression turned on
it runs with ~ 80% idle dissipating less than 35W (I am also thinking
of disconnecting CPU fan altogether)

-- 
Regards,
Cyril
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Rob Logan
   appears to have unlimited backups for 4.95 a month.

http://rsync.net/ $1.60 per month per G  (no experience)

to keep this more ontopic and not spam like. what about [home]
backups??.. what's the best deal for you:

1) a 4+1 (space) or 2*(2+1) (speed) 64bit 4G+ zfs nas
   (data for old thread topic :-)

2) same nas but rsync to a 3+0 pool kept remote, done periodically

3) same nas but rsync to a service

how large are physical and code base risks?

Rob

ps: sorry about hijacking the thread..
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread eric kustarz

 I'm using raidz2 across 8 drives, but if I had it to do again, I'd
 probably just use mirroring.  Unfortunately, raidz2 kills your random
 read and write performance, and that makes Time Machine really, really
 slow.  I'm running low on space now, and considering throwing another
 8 drives into the case in the spring, if I can find a cheap 8-port
 PCI-E SATA CARD.  When that happens, I'll probably try to convert
 everything to mirroring.


Not sure how you have those 8 drives configured, but if you haven't  
already then you should take a look at:
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ 
ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide#RAID- 
Z_Configuration_Requirements_and_Recommendations

If you could do it over again, then you would get better performance  
by having more top level vdevs.  So instead of a single 6+2 raidz2  
top level vdev, you could have (assuming two more disks), 2 3+2  
raidz2 vdevs.

Depends on what is important to you.

eric

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Tim Cook
http://rsync.net/ $1.60 per month per G (no experience)


^^how does that compete with 4.95/month for all you can store?  At 1.60/G, I 
dunno about most people here, but I'd be broke real quick :D

As for personal, mine's all 4+1.  I have the luxury of working for a storage 
reseller so backups are free :)
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread eric kustarz

On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Tim Cook wrote:

 www.mozy.com appears to have unlimited backups for 4.95 a month.   
 Hard to beat that.  And they're owned by EMC now so you know they  
 aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

I just signed on and am trying Mozy out.  Note, its $5 per computer  
and its *not* archival.  If you delete something on your computer,  
then 30 days later it is not going to be backed up anymore.

eric

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Nathan Kroenert
I see a business opportunity for someone...

Backups for the masses... of Unix / VMS and other OS/s out there.

any takers? :)

Nathan.

Jonathan Loran wrote:
 
 
 eric kustarz wrote:
 On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Tim Cook wrote:

   
 www.mozy.com appears to have unlimited backups for 4.95 a month.   
 Hard to beat that.  And they're owned by EMC now so you know they  
 aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
 

 I just signed on and am trying Mozy out.  Note, its $5 per computer  
 and its *not* archival.  If you delete something on your computer,  
 then 30 days later it is not going to be backed up anymore.

 eric
   
 
 And they don't support Solaris or Linux, so that means I would have to 
 transfer everything indirectly from my Mac.  Or worse yet, run windoz in 
 a VM.  Hardly practical.  Why is it we always have to be second class 
 citizens!  Power to the (*x) people!
 
 Jon
 
 -- 
 
 
 - _/ _/  /   - Jonathan Loran -   -
 -/  /   /IT Manager   -
 -  _  /   _  / / Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley
 -/  / /  (510) 643-5146 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - __/__/__/   AST:7731^29u18e3
  
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread mike
On 1/14/08, eric kustarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Tim Cook wrote:

  www.mozy.com appears to have unlimited backups for 4.95 a month.
  Hard to beat that.  And they're owned by EMC now so you know they
  aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

mozy's been okay, but only for windows/OS X.

uploading can be slow sometimes...

i do like rsync.net since it is a totally standards based solution,
not proprietary.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Tim Cook
Another free.99 option if you have the extra hardware lying around is boxbackup.

http://www.boxbackup.org/

I haven't used it personally, but heard good things.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Scott Laird
I've been tempted to get one of my neighbors to host a small box with
~4 drives and then either rsync or zfs send backups to it over wifi;
that'd protect against fire or theft, but not major earthquakes.  I
don't think we're at risk from any other obvious disasters.  The
up-front cost would be kind of steep, but sending 50 GB of new data at
a time would be trivial, unlike most online services.  With my current
DSL link, it'd take at least a week to ship 50 GB of data offsite, and
I have ~2 TB in use.  Even if I exclude some filesystems, it'd still
be a mess.  Of course, you have to be on good terms with your
neighbors for this to work.


Scott

On Jan 14, 2008 3:10 PM, Tim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Another free.99 option if you have the extra hardware lying around is 
 boxbackup.

 http://www.boxbackup.org/

 I haven't used it personally, but heard good things.


 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 ___

 zfs-discuss mailing list
 zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread David Magda

On Jan 14, 2008, at 17:15, mike wrote:

 On 1/14/08, eric kustarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Tim Cook wrote:

 www.mozy.com appears to have unlimited backups for 4.95 a month.
 Hard to beat that.  And they're owned by EMC now so you know they
 aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

 mozy's been okay, but only for windows/OS X.

 uploading can be slow sometimes...

 i do like rsync.net since it is a totally standards based solution,
 not proprietary.

There's also Amazon's S3. Published APIs so you can use already  
available utilities / libraries into whatever scripted solution you  
can think of.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread mike
except in my experience it is piss poor slow... but yes it is another
option that is -basically- built on standards (i say that only because
it's not really a traditional filesystem concept)

On 1/14/08, David Magda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Jan 14, 2008, at 17:15, mike wrote:

  On 1/14/08, eric kustarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
 
  www.mozy.com appears to have unlimited backups for 4.95 a month.
  Hard to beat that.  And they're owned by EMC now so you know they
  aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
 
  mozy's been okay, but only for windows/OS X.
 
  uploading can be slow sometimes...
 
  i do like rsync.net since it is a totally standards based solution,
  not proprietary.

 There's also Amazon's S3. Published APIs so you can use already
 available utilities / libraries into whatever scripted solution you
 can think of.

___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Anton B. Rang
OK, this isn't even vaguely ZFS-related, but at least with Mac OS X 10.5 and 
10.5.1, be aware that network volumes are unsupported because they don't work 
right.  :-)

For instance, 
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5918065#5918065 describes 
one case -- if the Samba destination fills up, Time Machine erases all of its 
backups.

On the other hand, if you don't mind living on the edge, at least for now ... 
for myself, I tend to be very conservative when it comes to backups. If they 
don't work when needed, they're not really backups. (And if you aren't testing 
periodically that you can restore, they aren't really backups. ;-)
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


Re: [zfs-discuss] hardware for zfs home storage

2008-01-14 Thread Tim Cook
Speaking of which, I'm somewhat surprised sun hasn't done similar with zfs and 
thumpers.  You would think they would want some sort of ultimate showcase that 
way :D  Drinking the koolaid and such :)
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss