Richard Elling wrote:
Hacked non-COW zvol? Since COW occurs at the DMU layer,
below ZPL or ZVol, I don't see how to bypass it. AFAIK,
the trick to using ZVols for swap was to just fix some bugs
in ZFS and rewrite the pertinent parts of the installer(s).
Swap just uses a normal ZVOL, which
Darren Reed wrote:
So I spent some time thinking about different directions you could build
on this in the future, for example:
1) controlling the size of the ARC/L2ARC by controlling the cache size
2) specifying different backing storage for primary/secondary cache
3) having more than two
Samba's integration with ZFS wasn't that great last time I tested. I had all
kinds of permission problems, mainly with inheritance. Windows deals with deny
entries very differently to Unix and I kept finding my test accounts were
denied access to new files folders.
Also, while I'm no Samba
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:25:09PM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
Really it boils down to lots of file systems to hold the OS adds
administrative complexity and rarely saves more work than it creates.
Some of us want to use different mount options on /var than on /.
That's why they need to be
Hi Everyone,
I perform a snapshot and a zfs send on a filesystem with a recordsize
of 16k, and redirect the output to a plain file. Later, I use cat
sentfs | zfs receive otherpool/filesystem. In this case the new
filesystem's recordsize will be the default 128k again. The other
filesystem
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:25:09PM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
Really it boils down to lots of file systems to hold the OS adds
administrative complexity and rarely saves more work than it creates.
Some of us want to use
It would seem that the ZFS Web UI lacks a few requisite classes to support the
updates ZFS features in snv_b89+.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Lori,
Lori Alt wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
Hi Jan, comments below...
jan damborsky wrote:
Hi folks,
I am member of Solaris Install team and I am currently working
on making Slim installer compliant with ZFS boot design specification:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Richard Elling wrote:
A side question though, my friends who run Windows,
Linux, or OSX don't seem to have this bias towards isolating
/var. Is this a purely Solaris phenomenon? If so, how do we
fix it?
In addition to the other answers given, I think another reason
why
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Lori Alt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Caiman team can make their own decision here, but we
decided to be more hard-nosed about disk space requirements in the
legacy install. If the pool is too small to accommodate the recommended
swap and dump zvols, then
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Justin Vassallo wrote:
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
external 449G 427G 27.4K /external
external/backup447G 427G 374G /external/backup
# zoneadm -z anzan boot
could not verify fs /backup: could not access
# zoneadm list -cp
0:global:running:/
-:anzan:installed:/zones/anzan
That of any help?
justin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Lori Alt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Caiman team can make their own decision here, but we
decided to be more hard-nosed about disk space requirements in the
legacy install. If the pool is too small to accommodate the recommended
swap
jan damborsky wrote:
Hi Lori,
Lori Alt wrote:
The Caiman team can make their own decision here, but we
decided to be more hard-nosed about disk space requirements in the
legacy install. If the pool is too small to accommodate the recommended
swap and dump zvols, then maybe this system
Lori Alt wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Lori Alt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Caiman team can make their own decision here, but we
decided to be more hard-nosed about disk space requirements in the
legacy install. If the pool is too small to accommodate
I have a similar problem -- my OS is borked-up-beyond-bootable (my bad, and I'm
not used to doing snapshots for rollback yet) and I'm going to need to
reinstall... but before I do that I wanted to double check and make sure that
I would still be able to access my storage zpools (raidz on
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 09:41 -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
IMHO, you can make dump optional, with no dump being default.
Before Sommerfeld pounces on me (again :-))
actually, in the case of virtual machines, doing the dump *in* the
virtual machine into preallocated virtual disk blocks is silly.
IBM's website says that Solaris 10u1 has them built in, Shouldn't that
mean they are in sNV too?
I'm booting off the network and off DVD, and just before the installer
starts I get a message about 'no disks found.'
Format does the same thing.
What driver module should be used for the
On 6/23/08 7:45 PM, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the ability to have different policies for file systems
is pure goodness -- though you pay for it on the backup/
restore side.
And another reason why Automated Data Migration is the way to go. Backup
and replication schemes
Keith Bierman wrote:
On Jun 24, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Dave Miner wrote:
I doubt we'd have interest in providing more configurability in the
interactive installer. As Richard sort of points out subsequently,
most
people wouldn't know what to do here, anyway, and the ones who do
usually use
Hello,
1st off, I am using ZFS under FreeBSD 7.0. Forgive me if this is the
wrong place (I do plan to post to FreeBSD as well, but this seems to be
more of a ZFS related question).
I am using a 3ware 9690SA-8E and two IBM EXP3000 chasis. One issue is the
3ware card isn't hard setting the
Problem solved.
I did a zfs mount followed by a zfs unmount, and then the zone booted fine.
Thanks to William from the zones-discuss and Mark Musante, both from Sun.
The more i work with zfs, the more confidence i get in it.
justin
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
and the tar file ...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
zfs-auto-snapshot-0.10_atjobs.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Is it possible to give access to the snapshots of a global zone (through
lofs perhaps?) into a zone? I recall that
you can't just delegate a snapshot dataset into a zone yet, but was
wondering if there is some lofs magic I can do?
Thanks
___
# zpool export zfs
cannot open 'zfs': no such pool
any command other than zpool import will give connot open 'zfs': no such pool
I can't seem to find any useful information on this type of error.
Did anyone have this kind of problem ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
This is good for a chuckle.
# zpool status
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scrub: resilver in progress for
Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 04:35:30PM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can only hope that ZFS boot will consign this never ending layout
argument to the dust of history.
The layout of disks and filesystems will always be a personal preference
and will never go
Mike,
Indeed an interesting result :) !
This is a known problem with VirtualBox :)
They have fixed it in the latest release
-- snip --
#1639: Solaris Virtual box guest keeps getting its time reset after resuming VM
from suspend
28 matches
Mail list logo
