Stephen Beecroft wrote:
-Stephen-
The US maintains that the actions against Iraq do not constitute
a war of aggression, but are a defense of family and freedoms.
-Mark-
Saying it doesn't make it so.
That's beside the point, which is that an argument can be made to
justify the US
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
-Marc-
Let me ask you the same question I've been asking others, than. If
the criteria that the U.S. are using were to be applied to other
countries in the area, a much better case could be made for
invading Pakistan. Yet instead the US pours billions into
-Marc-
Let me ask you the same question I've been asking others, than. If
the criteria that the U.S. are using were to be applied to other
countries in the area, a much better case could be made for
invading Pakistan. Yet instead the US pours billions into military
aid for Pakistan. Why the
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
-Marc-
Let me ask you the same question I've been asking others, than. If
the criteria that the U.S. are using were to be applied to other
countries in the area, a much better case could be made for
invading Pakistan. Yet instead the US pours billions into