Re: [ZION] No Desire to discuss what is forbidden

2002-11-21 Thread Marc A. Schindler
Gary Smith wrote: > Well there are two more things that haven't found their way into the > charter. First, to become a permanent member of the list, you have to > fill out a survey which you should be receiving any day now from Jim > Cobabe. Second, there is a tendency once in a while on this li

[ZION] No Desire to discuss what is forbidden

2002-11-20 Thread Gary Smith
Well there are two more things that haven't found their way into the charter. First, to become a permanent member of the list, you have to fill out a survey which you should be receiving any day now from Jim Cobabe. Second, there is a tendency once in a while on this list for it to collapse into a

RE: [ZION] No Desire To Discuss What Is Forbidden

2002-11-19 Thread Stephen Beecroft
-Marc- > My only fear in bringing Pamela Anderson into the discussion > was that I might be accused of artificiality > (tiddly-BOOM) As our Mexican neighbors might say, "Si! Si!" Stephen // /// ZION LIST CHARTER

Re: [ZION] No Desire To Discuss What Is Forbidden

2002-11-19 Thread Marc A. Schindler
My only fear in bringing Pamela Anderson into the discussion was that I might be accused of artificiality (tiddly-BOOM) Stacy Smith wrote: > Guys and gals, I finally read the charter just now. I found out, to my > utter delight, that I haven't violated any charter rules, nor did I ever > ha

[ZION] No Desire To Discuss What Is Forbidden

2002-11-19 Thread Stacy Smith
Guys and gals, I finally read the charter just now. I found out, to my utter delight, that I haven't violated any charter rules, nor did I ever have a desire to discuss such topics as are forbidden by charter rules. It seems as though I have already been obeying charter rules without even kno