-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ZION] The Descent of Man
If God is a man, and he existed before the world, and he created
the world,
how could mankind have evolved on
Gary:
Interesting speculation and observations.
I have long believed that Book of Moses provides the most comprehensive and
broad scriptural presentation we have as to how God went about creating the
worlds. It provides a account that is quite instructive generally. Moreover,
it seems to suggest
I guess I often thought about the differences between the account of the
creation in the Book of Moses and the Book of Abraham. I think the one in
Abraham is far more detailed.
Stacy.
At 09:44 AM 11/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Gary:
Interesting speculation and observations.
I have long
Actually, I erred. Moses is good, Abraham is better.
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] The Descent of Man
I guess I often thought about the differences between
Semantics, semantics. Better is probably not appropriate, just more
detailed and less detailed.
Stacy.
At 12:31 PM 11/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Actually, I erred. Moses is good, Abraham is better.
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Whatever.
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] The Descent of Man
Semantics, semantics. Better is probably not appropriate, just more
detailed and less detailed
