[Andreas Jung, on zope-dev; Tim added zodb-dev to this msg]
> I would like to consider the 2.7 branch closed for any kind of fixes except
> security related fixes. I don't plan any further 2.7 releases.
In that case (which is fine by me), I'll stop porting fixes to the
ZODB 3.2 line too. No chang
[Dmitry Vasiliev]
> Sure, but my reasonable assumption was that when you insert an exception
> message in a doctest you reread it another one time and fix typos if any.
Relying on ideal behavior is rarely a "reasonable assumption" ;-)
What actually happens is that people write new doctests, run t
[Florent Guillaume]
> Plagiarism! ;)
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2005-December/009560.html
Fascinating! I didn't know "plagiarism" was French for "open source" ;-)
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.or
Tim Peters wrote:
[Dennis Allison]
I have yet to figure out how to map a TransientObject "state" back
to the object it represents, but it clearly is possible.
I didn't see a response to that bit yet, so: "the state" of an object P is
whatever P.__getstate__() returns. Given such a return val
[Sidnei da Silva]
> But, why only the 2.8 tests would fail then?
Hey, it's your machine, you figure it out ;-) Note that test.py in 2.8 has
little in common with the test.py in 2.9 or Zope trunk, and they may very
well react in different ways to quirks in your environment.
> I'll try a 'make cle
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:01:59PM -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| But, why only the 2.8 tests would fail then? I'll try a 'make clean'
| before running the tests and see if it helps.
That did indeed help, sorry for the noise.
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems, LLC.
http://enfoldsystems.com
| No idea why it failed for you. The only thing that rings a bell here is
| that this test was added in ZODB 3.4.2b1, corresponding to this ZODB news
| entry:
|
| """
| BTrees
| --
|
| - (3.4.2b1) Collector 1873. It wasn't possible to construct a BTree
| or Bucket from, or apply their upd
[Sidnei]
> I've seen the following tests fail today, after updating Zope 2.8 branch
> ...
> Python 2.4.2 (#2, Nov 20 2005, 17:20:59)
> ...
BTW, I think the Official Story is that Python 2.4+ is still not supported
for Zope 2.8. I ran all the stuff in my reply with 2.4.2 too. Doesn't
matter, tho
[Sidnei da Silva]
> I've seen the following tests fail today, after updating Zope 2.8 branch
> for all variants of BTrees:
>
> ==
> ERROR: testUpdateFromPersistentMapping
> (BTrees.tests.testBTrees.IIBucketTest)
> -
I've seen the following tests fail today, after updating Zope 2.8
branch for all variants of BTrees:
==
ERROR: testUpdateFromPersistentMapping
(BTrees.tests.testBTrees.IIBucketTest)
[Chris Spencer]
> Instead of requiring all persistable objects to inherit a special class,
> wouldn't it be possible to dynamically wrap a class's __setattr__ and/or
> __setitem__ methods to determine when an object's been modified?
I'm not clear on what you're trying to accomplish, but any persis
Tim Peters wrote:
This is on a cluster of machines, with the errors not coming from any one
machine as far as I can see...
Networking gear and cables are also hardware ;-)
"large bank datacenter" -> not a chance in hell of sensibly testing this :-(
No need, you already did, and I added Die
[Tim]
>> I don't know, but if I were you I'd try running for a while on entirely
>> different hardware.
[Chris]
> This is on a cluster of machines, with the errors not coming from any one
> machine as far as I can see...
Networking gear and cables are also hardware ;-)
> 10:05 - Couldn't load st
Chris Spencer wrote:
I understand this has some drawbacks. Namely, it will only work for
new-style classes, but for a large code base this might be easier than
manually writing _p_changed = 1 everywhere.
The number of times you end up actually having to write this is pretty
minimal ;-)
Chri
Tim Peters wrote:
I don't know, but if I were you I'd try running for a while on entirely
different hardware.
This is on a cluster of machines, with the errors not coming from any
one machine as far as I can see...
10:05 - Couldn't load state for 0x013872b7: Traceback (most recent call
l
15 matches
Mail list logo
