I have made two checkins to relstorage 1.1 branch:
[1] http://svn.zope.org/relstorage/branches/1.1/?rev=88789view=rev
[2] http://svn.zope.org/relstorage/branches/1.1/?rev=88790view=rev
If someone wants to discuss them this is the thread. ;-)
Ad [1]:
This clearly is not the only problem with
Stefan H. Holek wrote:
I have made two checkins to relstorage 1.1 branch:
It's really cool to have another contributor. Thanks! 1.1c1 has
already been tagged, so I fixed the change log.
[1] http://svn.zope.org/relstorage/branches/1.1/?rev=88789view=rev
[2]
On Thursday 24 July 2008, Shane Hathaway wrote:
P.S.: I am quite excited about the memcached support. Does it just
work? I.e. can I run my ZODB in RAM now? ;-)
I expect the new memcache support to be safe for everyone to use, but we
still require the main database to be connected at all
Stephan Richter wrote:
We should get Brian Aker into this discussion, since is one of the main
architects of MySQL and one of the founders of memcached.
As Shane knows, I have some access to Brian these days, so we could have an
online meeting talking about it.
Cool. Memcache could do a
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 24 July 2008, Shane Hathaway wrote:
P.S.: I am quite excited about the memcached support. Does it just
work? I.e. can I run my ZODB in RAM now? ;-)
I expect the new memcache support to be safe for everyone to use, but we
still require the main
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message for revision 88796:
Correct error in persistance-bbb logic spotted by Jacob Holm
It seems strange (and a bit frightening) that -- ostensibly -- the tests
pass either way the code reads. Is there a missing
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found the ZODB website to be very disorganized an not nearly as
helpful as repeated googlings.
I have been collecting links and writing some new text for the new ZODB
website. But alas there are only so many hours in the day.
