RE: Re: [ZODB-Dev] Handling more databases with zeo

2005-06-29 Thread Chris McDonough
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:46 -0400, Tim Peters wrote: > [Chris McDonough] > > I also use this feature but I would be happy to stop using it if it made > > the code materially simpler to maintain. > > I don't hate the feature, but I hate that it's undocumented, and I hate that > it's untested. I pa

RE: Re: [ZODB-Dev] Handling more databases with zeo

2005-06-29 Thread Tim Peters
[Chris McDonough] > I also use this feature but I would be happy to stop using it if it made > the code materially simpler to maintain. I don't hate the feature, but I hate that it's undocumented, and I hate that it's untested. I particularly hate that the ClientStorage constructor has 17 argumen

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Handling more databases with zeo

2005-06-29 Thread Jim Fulton
Chris McDonough wrote: I also use this feature but I would be happy to stop using it if it made the code materially simpler to maintain. +1 Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corp

Re: Re: [ZODB-Dev] Handling more databases with zeo

2005-06-29 Thread Chris McDonough
I also use this feature but I would be happy to stop using it if it made the code materially simpler to maintain. - C On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:31 -0400, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > On 6/29/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Tim Peters] > > >> > > >> As before, I'd run a different ZEO

Re: Re: [ZODB-Dev] Handling more databases with zeo

2005-06-29 Thread Jeremy Hylton
On 6/29/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Tim Peters] > >> > >> As before, I'd run a different ZEO server for each database. I'm not > >> sure that what you're doing here will be supported for much longer (or > >> really even _is_ supported anymore -- see my last msg). > > [Dieter

RE: Re: [ZODB-Dev] Handling more databases with zeo

2005-06-29 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim Peters] >> >> As before, I'd run a different ZEO server for each database. I'm not >> sure that what you're doing here will be supported for much longer (or >> really even _is_ supported anymore -- see my last msg). [Dieter Maurer] > I do not know whether it is supported but it works in

RE: Re: [ZODB-Dev] Handling more databases with zeo

2005-06-29 Thread Dieter Maurer
Tim Peters wrote at 2005-6-28 17:09 -0400: > >As before, I'd run a different ZEO server for each database. I'm not sure >that what you're doing here will be supported for much longer (or really >even _is_ supported anymore -- see my last msg). I do not know whether it is supported but it wo

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Handling more databases with zeo

2005-06-29 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim Peters] >> As before, I'd run a different ZEO server for each database.  I'm not >> sure that what you're doing here will be supported for much longer (or >> really even _is_ supported anymore -- see my last msg). [Lukas Linhart] > Well, I'm stuck on zodb 3.2.x line because I'm using IndexedC

[ZODB-Dev] Re: Zope 2.8.1 (was RE: TmpStore missing loadBefore)

2005-06-29 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 29. Juni 2005 10:38:27 -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Andreas Jung] The Plone guys asked about a 2.8.1 release for end of July/start of August which should not be a problem. Since they are working on making Plone 2.1 work with Zope 2.8 there is a good chance that further bu

[ZODB-Dev] Zope 2.8.1 (was RE: TmpStore missing loadBefore)

2005-06-29 Thread Tim Peters
[Andreas Jung] > The Plone guys asked about a 2.8.1 release for end of July/start of > August which should not be a problem. Since they are working on making > Plone 2.1 work with Zope 2.8 there is a good chance that further bugs > show up which should be fixed for 2.8.1. So 2.8.1 b1 could be relea