On 27.04.2009 15:13 Uhr, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Note that ZODB 3.9 is pretty stable. We're using it in production. It
> is alpha mainly because Shane and I are still sorting out integration
> of RelStorage.
Speaking of ZODB 3.9 - when do you expect going beta (I know it's done
when it is done) sinc
David Glick wrote:
> Taking the existing ExportImport.py code as a starting point, it looks
> like I would need to:
> 1. modify the persistent_load method to handle rewriting extended
> references of types 'n' and 'm'
> 2. provide some way to process several export files at once, and input
>
Attached is a minimally changed analyze.py file, it adds a min, max
size of class types.
Maybe someone can help me. We have a customer whose running out of memory.
We suspect it is content related, i.e. they uploaded a really big file
and in some way
the entire file is a single PData or some attr
On Apr 27, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Alan Runyan wrote:
>> In ZODB 3.9, you can pack without doing garbage collection. This
>> should at least buy you time, if not solve your problem (depending on
>> how much garbage your application creates.
>
> What about zc.FileStorage? Does this support packing w/o
> In ZODB 3.9, you can pack without doing garbage collection. This
> should at least buy you time, if not solve your problem (depending on
> how much garbage your application creates.
What about zc.FileStorage? Does this support packing w/o GC?
And does that work on versions of ZODB < 3.9?
_
