Tino Wildenhain wrote:
apt-get install wwwoffle :-)
C:\Zope>apt-get install wwwoffle
'apt-get' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
:-(
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.u
Chris Withers schrieb:
...
One of the non-cool things though, is that Firefox doesn't download
links on pages without you clicking on them... bummer when you're
working offline ;-)
apt-get install wwwoffle :-)
Regards
Tino
___
For more information a
Jim Fulton wrote:
That page is part of a collection of pages and it links to other
pages to provide details on various subjects. One of the cool things
about the web is that you don't have to put everything in a single page.
One of the non-cool things though, is that Firefox doesn't download
Chris Withers wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
See the egg intro doc at http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/
PythonEggs .
I've scanned that before... Jim's mentioned some pretty deep and
interesting stuff, I wondered if he'd found more in-depth docs or
whether I was just missing stuff on
Chris McDonough wrote:
See the egg intro doc at http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/
PythonEggs .
I've scanned that before... Jim's mentioned some pretty deep and
interesting stuff, I wondered if he'd found more in-depth docs or
whether I was just missing stuff on that page...
Chris
--
Package "depth" has no impact on performance (at least that I've
noticed). It's almost certainly not the primary reason for any given
Python program to be slow. I'd like to read that blog entry to see
if that person knows more than I do.
As far as eggs go, AFAIK, package depth is not real
Hi!
Somewhere I have red (in a blog) comparing java and python. If I
remember well the main reason to write that was the Boa (?) constructor
written by java programmers...
So: It states that Python packages should be as flat as possible (use
less names in the namespace (?)), since the name s
See the egg intro doc at http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/
PythonEggs .
Maybe the best example of using eggs as packaging units is in
TurboGears. You can see it in action by installing it.
- C
On Jan 23, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
2. I think a real
Jim Fulton wrote:
2. I think a real packaging system, like eggs would have helped here.
Eggs in particular would have allowed multiple versions of
zope.interface
to be installed. Zope would have gotten the version it needed and ZODB
would have gotten the version it needed. (Hm, maybe
[Jim Fulton]
> I have 2 answers. :)
>
> 1. This points out the benefit of not treating Zope as a library.
> Zope releases contain specific configurations of packages known
> to work together. It should have control over that configuration
> and it can't do that if everything is slammed
Tim Peters wrote:
...
That's my fault, and I apologize for the inconvenience. Alas, I'm not sure
it won't happen again -- while sharing packages across projects has many
attractions, it also creates that many more opportunities for "related"
projects to get out of synch wrt the package versions
[replying to private email here, with permission]
[Egon Frerich]
> maybe you are interested in this.
>
> I installed Zope 3 (version 3.2) in python 2.4.2 site-packages (Windows
> XP Home - but I assume this is not important).
Windows isn't relevant to the problem you hit, no.
> Then I installed
12 matches
Mail list logo
