On 15.11.2008 16:11 Uhr, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Nov 15, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi there,
is there a way to analyze the data committed during one transaction?
The current usecase is Plone. A simple change to a document causes a
large transaction (between 30k and 100k even for a o
On Nov 17, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
...
> Rephrasing my question in a different way: how can I get hold of the
> "parent" object based a persistent object with a _p_jar
> connection? E.g. when the ZODB commits a subobject (e.g. a BTree or
> a bucket) of portal_catalog/Indexes/some
On 17.11.2008 16:01 Uhr, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Nov 17, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
...
Rephrasing my question in a different way: how can I get hold of the
"parent" object based a persistent object with a _p_jar
connection? E.g. when the ZODB commits a subobject (e.g. a BTree or a
buck
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> ...
>> Rephrasing my question in a different way: how can I get hold of the
>> "parent" object based a persistent object with a _p_jar
>> connection? E.g. when the ZODB comm
On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Alan Runyan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> ...
>>> Rephrasing my question in a different way: how can I get hold of the
>>> "parent" object based a persistent ob
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-11-17 14:21 +0100:
> ...
>> On Nov 15, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> is there a way to analyze the data committed during one transaction?
>>> The current usecase is Plone. A simple change to a document causes a
>>> large transaction (between 30k and 100k even
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> ...
>> Rephrasing my question in a different way: how can I get hold of the
>> "parent" object based a persistent object with a _p_jar
>> connection? E.g. when the ZODB commits a subobject (e.g. a BTree or
>> a bucket) of po
Hi all,
In a warty old application, I'm hitting memory constraints that I
think the 3.8.1 changes in ZODB might fix.
Is someone using Plone on 3.8.1 already? If so, what should I change
in my highly customised buildout to give it a try?
--r.
Russ Ferriday - Topia Systems - Open Source co
Russ Ferriday wrote:
> In a warty old application, I'm hitting memory constraints that I think
> the 3.8.1 changes in ZODB might fix.
We are running both Plone 3.0 and 3.1 in production with ZODB 3.8.1 on
two quite large sites (one has RelStorage, the other one blob storage).
I'd consider it produ
