I submitted this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zodb/+bug/165287
But was not able to compile the package after the recommended patch from
"esteve". He did refer me to this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/+bug/153316
I have been trying to find a version that I can compile and
On Dec 3, 2007 3:14 AM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All tests are passing for me (except one, see below). I'll reject the
> bug.
>
Well, it certainly still affects zodb 3.6 and 3.7. I filed a bug
against 3.6in the Ubuntu repositories, and "esteve" is helping me with
that, but yo
On Dec 3, 2007 1:26 PM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, it certainly still affects zodb 3.6 and 3.7. I filed a bug
> > against 3.6 in the Ubuntu repositories, and "esteve" is helping me
> > with that, but your patch against 3.8 doesn't fix 3.6 or 3.7.
>
>
> No, it doesn't because
On Dec 1, 2007 10:09 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/tags/3.8.0b5
>
I checked that out and went through the "buildout" instructions under
"Testing for Developers". I got about a bazillion failed tests, ending in a
core dump. Many of the tests loo
On Dec 3, 2007 3:26 PM, Matt Feifarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 1, 2007 10:09 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Use svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/tags/3.8.0b5
> >
>
> I checked that out and went through the "buildout" in
On Dec 3, 2007 3:33 PM, Esteve Fernàndez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so there must be something weird in your environment, my patch (which
> is just a backport fix to ZODB 3.6 from ZODB svn repo) applies cleanly
> and fixes all porting issues in BTree and Persistent modules.
>
How did you make t
On Dec 3, 2007 4:12 PM, Esteve Fernàndez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Something weird" may indeed be up... but I don't know where to look.
>
Ok, I found it.
On the advice of others, I put a file in my
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/distutils called distutils.cfg. This file
contained the fol
