Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Anybody using ZODB with no calls to fsync in production?
OK: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/FsyncBehaviourSetting ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Anybody using ZODB with no calls to fsync in production?
Christian Theune wrote: Hi, Lennart Regebro wrote: OK, cool. Anybody feel like implementing it? I might, but I will not have time before february, and people who know the ZODB.code already will probably make a faster and better job. Can you put it on line in some wiki? Specifically: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/FrontPage Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Anybody using ZODB with no calls to fsync in production?
Hi, Lennart Regebro wrote: > OK, cool. Anybody feel like implementing it? > > I might, but I will not have time before february, and people who know > the ZODB.code already will probably make a faster and better job. Can you put it on line in some wiki? Maybe I have some time before February. ;) Christian -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Anybody using ZODB with no calls to fsync in production?
OK, cool. Anybody feel like implementing it? I might, but I will not have time before february, and people who know the ZODB.code already will probably make a faster and better job. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.nuxeo.org/ ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Anybody using ZODB with no calls to fsync in production?
Chris Withers wrote: David Binger wrote: This is an interesting point, and it makes me wonder if there would be interest having the fsync behavior vary on a per-transaction basis instead of a per-storage basis. Maybe the client submitting transactions that are just Session-like changes could include a message to the server indicating that this transaction is not precious. Nah, too subtle/fragile/complicated... ...that's my gut feel anyway. I really like the proposal as it stands though :-) Agreed. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Anybody using ZODB with no calls to fsync in production?
David Binger wrote: This is an interesting point, and it makes me wonder if there would be interest having the fsync behavior vary on a per-transaction basis instead of a per-storage basis. Maybe the client submitting transactions that are just Session-like changes could include a message to the server indicating that this transaction is not precious. Nah, too subtle/fragile/complicated... ...that's my gut feel anyway. I really like the proposal as it stands though :-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Anybody using ZODB with no calls to fsync in production?
On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: +1. Sessions might be a good example of a storage using 'fsync-behavior=None': you would get the speedup, and the ability to survive a restart, without needing to treat the data as "precious". This is an interesting point, and it makes me wonder if there would be interest having the fsync behavior vary on a per-transaction basis instead of a per-storage basis. Maybe the client submitting transactions that are just Session-like changes could include a message to the server indicating that this transaction is not precious. ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
