Wichert Akkerman wrote:
For some of us a the main reason for using RelStorage is to be able to
satisfy the 'all data must be stored in our oracle cluster' requirement
from enterprise customers. That means we can not use NFS mounts to store
blobs.
You have a point, and I know how stubborn ente
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 08:33:34AM -0300, David Pratt wrote:
> Hi Christian. Curious, what were you using for postgres replication?
> Many thanks.
The only solution that I know of is slony (which is also sold in a commerical
wrapping by EnterpriseDB) which is very awkward. I'm not aware of other
Hi Christian. Curious, what were you using for postgres replication?
Many thanks.
David
Christian Theune wrote:
I'm kind of curious what a match of RelStorage and ZEORaid may give. FWIW my
experiences with Postgresql replication aren't that good so you could still go
that route using two Rel
Christian Theune wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:47:45PM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
David Durham, Jr. wrote:
My questions is whether or not RelStorage supports BLOBs. My
situation is that I have a Plone site with user uploaded images and
other files, that should presumably be store
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:47:45PM -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> David Durham, Jr. wrote:
>> My questions is whether or not RelStorage supports BLOBs. My
>> situation is that I have a Plone site with user uploaded images and
>> other files, that should presumably be stored as BLOBs with
>> RelSto
David Durham, Jr. wrote:
My questions is whether or not RelStorage supports BLOBs. My
situation is that I have a Plone site with user uploaded images and
other files, that should presumably be stored as BLOBs with
RelStorage. I'm open to placing BLOBs outside of RelStorage if that's
reasonably
