Re: [zones-discuss] swap memory cap and swap command output

Mike Gerdts wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Glenn Brunette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> My apologies if this is a RTFM moment, but I have been looking and have >> been unable to find an answer. If memory caps are defined for a given >> zone, why doesn't the output of swap display the

Re: [zones-discuss] swap memory cap and swap command output

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Glenn Brunette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My apologies if this is a RTFM moment, but I have been looking and have > been unable to find an answer. If memory caps are defined for a given > zone, why doesn't the output of swap display the cap? > > # zonecfg -z we

Re: [zones-discuss] swap memory cap and swap command output

Thanks! Jerry Jelinek wrote: > Glenn Brunette wrote: >> My apologies if this is a RTFM moment, but I have been looking and have >> been unable to find an answer. If memory caps are defined for a given >> zone, why doesn't the output of swap display the cap? > > 6572077 size of swapfs filesystem

Re: [zones-discuss] swap memory cap and swap command output

Glenn Brunette wrote: > My apologies if this is a RTFM moment, but I have been looking and have > been unable to find an answer. If memory caps are defined for a given > zone, why doesn't the output of swap display the cap? 6572077 size of swapfs filesystems in a zone should reflect zone.max-swap

[zones-discuss] swap memory cap and swap command output

My apologies if this is a RTFM moment, but I have been looking and have been unable to find an answer. If memory caps are defined for a given zone, why doesn't the output of swap display the cap? # zonecfg -z web info capped-memory capped-memory: physical: 1G [swap: 200M] # zon