Mads Toftum wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:44:42PM -0400, Jeff Victor wrote:
I would choose 50%. For 3 zones, 75% doesn't accomplish enough. At 50%,
they will (hopefully) investigate the performance issue and be happily
surprised when they learn they've been using a default value...
Menno Lageman wrote:
Another option for RM templates would be that the template is a pointer
to a set of RM defaults instead of being used directly during zone
creation. This way, changing RM settings of existing zones would simply
entail changing the template in one place. Or, when moving a
Jeff Victor wrote:
Here we have a difficult non-technical decision to make. Which is
'better':
1) No out-of-the-box controls - the current situation. The
unsuspecting zone creator will unwittingly allow DoS attacks by zones
until it becomes clear that RM controls should be used, either
Menno Lageman wrote:
Jeff Victor wrote:
Here we have a difficult non-technical decision to make. Which is
'better':
1) No out-of-the-box controls - the current situation. The
unsuspecting zone creator will unwittingly allow DoS attacks by zones
until it becomes clear that RM controls
We have installed and created websphere 6 in solaris 10 zone using sun white
paper How to Get strated with IBM Websphere Application Server on Solaris 10
and zones, however the document didn't address how to apply patches for
websphere 6 in the zone environment. Can some one please address this
