Re: [zones-discuss] S10 6/06, proc_priocntl and Oracle 10R3

2007-06-29 Thread Mike Gerdts
On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, you can't do that except by upgrading to a later Solaris 10 release. It seems to me that what is really needed is a fix for 4966416[1]. It looks to me as though the current rev of the zones patch[2] has this. Of course the dependency

Re: [zones-discuss] S10 6/06, proc_priocntl and Oracle 10R3

2007-06-29 Thread Casper . Dik
>I'm running S10 6/06 and trying to upgrade Oracle from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.3. >The problem we're facing is that the the CRS daemons can't start because >something is trying to set a process to priority -20. I opened an SR with >Oracle and their recommendation is: zonecfg -z set >limitpriv=defaul

[zones-discuss] S10 6/06, proc_priocntl and Oracle 10R3

2007-06-29 Thread Steve Zinck
I'm running S10 6/06 and trying to upgrade Oracle from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.3. The problem we're facing is that the the CRS daemons can't start because something is trying to set a process to priority -20. I opened an SR with Oracle and their recommendation is: zonecfg -z set limitpriv=default,pro

[zones-discuss] Re: Re: [nfs-discuss] NFS server in zones

2007-06-29 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
> Tom Haynes wrote: > > > > What about the case where the customer wants to > administer the zone they purchased > > and they do not want the global zone admins to have > local access to > > their data? > > That would violate basics of the zones model. The > global zone admin has > complete acc