Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp/zone

2007-12-19 Thread Peter Memishian
> > > Contrary to what everyone else says, with a bit of customization dhcpd > > > can run zones just fine. Solaris 10 update 3 and later (I forget > > > which Nevada build) have all the required bits in place. > > > > > > > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/install-discuss/2007

Re: [zones-discuss] Question on new Nov patch cluster for a zoned system.

2007-12-19 Thread EndaO'Connor
Hi If the cluster has 127111 or 127112 ( sparc | x86 KU ), and if 120011-14 is also being installed, then a reboot is required after applying 120011-1 4, otherwise corruption will occur, if the cluster does contain 127111|127113 then get the latest cluster as these have been removed, pending a f

Re: [zones-discuss] Question on new Nov patch cluster for a zoned system.

2007-12-19 Thread Stewart, Tom L.
Ahh, Now it makes sense The error was ( I had to change the server name to protect the innocent). zoneadm: /zones/x: No such file or directory could not verify zonepath /zones/x because of the above errors. zoneadm: zone xx failed to verify I didn't even think of that as I did d

Re: [zones-discuss] Question on new Nov patch cluster for a zoned system.

2007-12-19 Thread EndaO'Connor
Stewart, Tom L. wrote: > All, > > I have a T2000 with a couple of zones and when I tried to install the > patch cluster from Nov 07 in the Global zone, it failed. > any idea why it failed, are there logs, patchadd output? it should not have failed > According to the CLUSTER_README > > WARNING!!

[zones-discuss] Question on new Nov patch cluster for a zoned system.

2007-12-19 Thread Stewart, Tom L.
All, I have a T2000 with a couple of zones and when I tried to install the patch cluster from Nov 07 in the Global zone, it failed. According to the CLUSTER_README WARNING!! IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that the installation of this patch cluster be performed in single-user mode (Run Level S). So