Remember that FSS is designed to provide a minimum, but not a max.
Depending on CPU use by other threads in the class, a given thread may
get more than it's alloted CPU shares, but it will never get less.
/jim
Brian Kolaci wrote:
Jeff Victor wrote:
Brian Kolaci wrote:
I've been discussing
The only correct way to do capacity planning is to plot application
throughput
with system utilization. Maybe you can run 40 Zones each with a webserver,
and a database Zone, or maybe 4. Or 1. It's completely workload dependent.
The system utilization data, without corresponding throughput and r
d hit counts
Thanks,
/jim
Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 13 Mar 2007 at 08:44PM, Jim Mauro wrote:
The only correct way to do capacity planning is to plot application
throughput with system utilization. Maybe you can run 40 Zones each
with a webserver, and a database Zone, or maybe 4. Or 1. It&#
Thanks Jerry - Clarification below...
>> Do the resource bindings migrate, or do they need to be
>> redone after the migration has completed on the target system?
>
> I am not sure what you mean by "bindings". The RM settings in
> zonecfg will migrate if you create the zone on the new host
> us
Does Zone migration factor in resource allocations?
If I have zoneA on sysA, and have configured
zone.cpu-shares, or some other resource control,
does the migration process, and/or the dry-run feature
check for availability of configured resources, or is this
simply required due-diligence on the p
IKOAC (I know of a customer) that would like to write an
agent that runs in the global zone and detects state changes
in the non-global zones on the system.
Anyone listening been down this road???
Thanks,
/jim
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-disc
