Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Menno,
No, this is not correct. The dry-run spec in the arc case has
the correct definition.
The man page is in error and the way you were using it is
correct. This got broken with the brandz putback.
Yeah, I noticed that when I tried it between two systems instead of
Menno Lageman wrote:
Menno Lageman wrote:
Hi,
doing a dry-run attach of a detached zone fails with the message
"zoneadm: missing or invalid brand" and exit code 1. Attaching the
zone for real succeeds though. I would expect the dry-run to succeed
too because the zone was created on this syst
Menno Lageman wrote:
Hi,
doing a dry-run attach of a detached zone fails with the message
"zoneadm: missing or invalid brand" and exit code 1. Attaching the zone
for real succeeds though. I would expect the dry-run to succeed too
because the zone was created on this system so everything (pack