Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Attach dry-run fails with missing or invalid brand

2006-11-16 Thread Menno Lageman
Jerry Jelinek wrote: Menno, No, this is not correct. The dry-run spec in the arc case has the correct definition. The man page is in error and the way you were using it is correct. This got broken with the brandz putback. Yeah, I noticed that when I tried it between two systems instead of

Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Attach dry-run fails with missing or invalid brand

2006-11-16 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Menno Lageman wrote: Menno Lageman wrote: Hi, doing a dry-run attach of a detached zone fails with the message "zoneadm: missing or invalid brand" and exit code 1. Attaching the zone for real succeeds though. I would expect the dry-run to succeed too because the zone was created on this syst

[zones-discuss] Re: Attach dry-run fails with missing or invalid brand

2006-11-16 Thread Menno Lageman
Menno Lageman wrote: Hi, doing a dry-run attach of a detached zone fails with the message "zoneadm: missing or invalid brand" and exit code 1. Attaching the zone for real succeeds though. I would expect the dry-run to succeed too because the zone was created on this system so everything (pack