[zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-09-20 Thread Brian Kolaci
With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database raw devices vs. using a filesystem anymore. To test this out, my customer would like to try both ufs and vxfs filesystems in the global zone and lofs mount

Re: [zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-08-22 Thread Brian Kolaci
Carisdad wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Brian, Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote: BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm BK told that there's not much of a difference

Re: [zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-08-22 Thread Jeff Victor
Brian Kolaci wrote: Carisdad wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Brian, Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote: BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm BK told that there's not

Re: [zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-08-22 Thread Brian Kolaci
Jeff Victor wrote: Brian Kolaci wrote: Carisdad wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Brian, Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote: BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm BK

Re: [zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-08-21 Thread przemolicc
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Brian, Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote: BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database BK raw devices

Re: [zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-08-21 Thread Carisdad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Brian, Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote: BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the

Re: [zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-08-18 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Brian, Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote: BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database BK raw devices vs. using a filesystem anymore. BK To test this out, my customer would

[zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-07-26 Thread Brian Kolaci
With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database raw devices vs. using a filesystem anymore. To test this out, my customer would like to try both ufs and vxfs filesystems in the global zone and lofs mount

Re: [zones-discuss] zones databases

2006-07-26 Thread Rich Teer
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Brian Kolaci wrote: To test this out, my customer would like to try both ufs and vxfs filesystems in the global zone and lofs mount them to a local zone and test the database on that lofs mount. I'd also recommend that your customer tries the tests on ZFS too. -- Rich