I am really glad that you both bring this issue up. I frankly
would rather that there be no license at all. After all there is
nothing new under the Sun in the Zone Manager. Its just a script that
I hope helps make zones management much easier. However I can't open
source the Zone Manager throu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To mitigate barriers to adoption.
Which barriers to adoption?
You've also erected a new barrier to adoption (for those who prefer
CDDL over GPLv2 and find GPLv2 too restrictive)
I also completely fail to understand how a GPLv2 zone manager tool built
on top of the
>To mitigate barriers to adoption.
Which barriers to adoption?
You've also erected a new barrier to adoption (for those who prefer
CDDL over GPLv2 and find GPLv2 too restrictive)
Casper
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
>On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >Brad Diggs wrote:
>> >> * Switched from CDDL license to GPLv2.
>> >
>> >I'm curious why did the license switch to GPLv2 ?
>>
>> And noone has contributed any code to this point?
>>
>>
>Mostly sun contributors but have also had ou
Mostly sun contributors but have also had outside contribution as well.
Brad
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Brad Diggs wrote:
> >> * Switched from CDDL license to GPLv2.
> >
> >I'm curious why did the license switch to GPLv2 ?
>
> And noone has contributed any co
To mitigate barriers to adoption.
Brad
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:48 +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Brad Diggs wrote:
> > * Switched from CDDL license to GPLv2.
>
> I'm curious why did the license switch to GPLv2 ?
>
>
___
zones-discuss mailing list
>Brad Diggs wrote:
>> * Switched from CDDL license to GPLv2.
>
>I'm curious why did the license switch to GPLv2 ?
And noone has contributed any code to this point?
Casper
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
