Carisdad wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm
BK told that there's not much of a difference
Brian Kolaci wrote:
Carisdad wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm
BK told that there's not
Jeff Victor wrote:
Brian Kolaci wrote:
Carisdad wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris
versions I'm
BK
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm
BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database
BK raw devices
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm
BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
BK With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm
BK told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database
BK raw devices vs. using a filesystem anymore.
BK To test this out, my customer would
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Brian Kolaci wrote:
To test this out, my customer would like to try both ufs and vxfs
filesystems in the global zone and lofs mount them to a local zone
and test the database on that lofs mount.
I'd also recommend that your customer tries the tests on ZFS too.
--
Rich