Re: Zookeeper Test Project
> Sounds good, I have created an ASF JIRA account, but it doesn't look like I > can attach a file in Step 2 of the "Create Issue" screen. Do I have to > create the jira first then attach the file? Yes. Please take a look at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/HowToContribute On some guidelines on contributing. Thanks mahadev > > >> >> Also, if you are willing to work a little more on your queue >> implementation, >> we could have that as a part of src/recipes and then people could use that. >> Tests can be added to this recipe to verify them... >> > > Just took a look at the lock recipe, I'll start working on a queue recipe > and tests. > > Steven > > > >> >> Thanks >> mahadev >> >> On 10/5/09 1:45 PM, "Steve Cheng" wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The test project on the ProjectSuggestions page, to create tests for the >>> examples, sounded like a nice way to get started with ZooKeeper, I've >> created >>> one queue test and one lock test so far. >>> >>> I'd like to make a good range of tests, a number of basic sanity ones >> like the >>> queue test, and some more involved ones like the lock test. The lock >> test >>> does polling right now, another test would also test watching. I think >> it's >>> useful to test both. >>> >>> Any comments on this would be great, I noticed the bug about the test >> case >>> runtime so I'm not sure what that means for more tests, thanks, >>> >>> Steven >>> >>> >> >>
Re: Zookeeper Test Project
Hi Mahadev, Can you please create a jira and upload the code to that jira for > feedback? I am guessing that you want to contribute these tests back to > zookeeper right ? > Also, do take a look at src/recipes/lock for an implementation of locks on > top of zookeeper. They have some tests as well. > Sounds good, I have created an ASF JIRA account, but it doesn't look like I can attach a file in Step 2 of the "Create Issue" screen. Do I have to create the jira first then attach the file? > > Also, if you are willing to work a little more on your queue > implementation, > we could have that as a part of src/recipes and then people could use that. > Tests can be added to this recipe to verify them... > Just took a look at the lock recipe, I'll start working on a queue recipe and tests. Steven > > Thanks > mahadev > > On 10/5/09 1:45 PM, "Steve Cheng" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The test project on the ProjectSuggestions page, to create tests for the > > examples, sounded like a nice way to get started with ZooKeeper, I've > created > > one queue test and one lock test so far. > > > > I'd like to make a good range of tests, a number of basic sanity ones > like the > > queue test, and some more involved ones like the lock test. The lock > test > > does polling right now, another test would also test watching. I think > it's > > useful to test both. > > > > Any comments on this would be great, I noticed the bug about the test > case > > runtime so I'm not sure what that means for more tests, thanks, > > > > Steven > > > > > >
Re: Zookeeper Test Project
Hi Steve, Can you please create a jira and upload the code to that jira for feedback? I am guessing that you want to contribute these tests back to zookeeper right ? Also, do take a look at src/recipes/lock for an implementation of locks on top of zookeeper. They have some tests as well. Also, if you are willing to work a little more on your queue implementation, we could have that as a part of src/recipes and then people could use that. Tests can be added to this recipe to verify them... Thanks mahadev On 10/5/09 1:45 PM, "Steve Cheng" wrote: > Hi, > > The test project on the ProjectSuggestions page, to create tests for the > examples, sounded like a nice way to get started with ZooKeeper, I've created > one queue test and one lock test so far. > > I'd like to make a good range of tests, a number of basic sanity ones like the > queue test, and some more involved ones like the lock test. The lock test > does polling right now, another test would also test watching. I think it's > useful to test both. > > Any comments on this would be great, I noticed the bug about the test case > runtime so I'm not sure what that means for more tests, thanks, > > Steven > >
