CPS 3.4.0 beta2 has been released yesterday.
Tarballs/zipballs are available here:
http://www.cps-project.org/static/src/CPS-3.4.0beta2.tar.gz
http://www.cps-project.org/static/src/CPS-3.4.0beta2.zip
We're planning a final release next week (after the CMF 1.6.0 release
which is planned for Sunda
Andrew Milton wrote:
> +---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
> | Andrew Milton wrote:
> | > +---[ Stephan Richter ]--
> | > | Hello everyone,
> | > |
> | > | With the development of Zope 3, the Zope developers committed to a new
> | > | development pr
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
This should show at least zope-2.7. If that shows up you can find the
documentation and how to setup an instance in /usr/share/doc/zope-2.7.
Although, in all seriousness, I'd recommend installing from source.
And I'd recommend the original poster read Eric Raymond's "how
Fernando Martins wrote:
I'm using LocalFS 1.7rc? and Zope 2.8.? in a Suse system. More importantly
for this case, zope is behind Apache 1.39 with module NTLM,
What are you using to do NTLM?
through FastCGI,
Why on earth would you inflict this on yourself? ;-)
When I access a file in a Lo
Anton Stonor wrote:
Right, I just thought that made little sence when it came to Poskey Errors.
There are reasons why we ask for these things...
Zope 2.7.8, Plone 2.0.5. Tracebacks such as:
2005-12-09T18:46:04 ERROR(200) ZODB Couldn't load state for 0x04b364
Traceback (most recent call last)
Christoph Berendes wrote:
so I've padded this with blanks to hit the buffer size. Klugey,but works.
Any reason why you don't just lower the buffer size?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Andrew Milton wrote:
| In a ZSQL Method, I have tablename.
| and I get tablename.'species_value', what I need is
| tablename."species_value". Any idea how I can get Zope/ZSQL to not
| put in the single quotes (or use double quotes)?
|
tablename.
Don't use sqlvar except for things you want qu
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Nicolas Georgakopoulos schrieb:
Hello Zopistas,
I need a little guidance for a site that must make image processing on
the fly.
Users should be able to upload image files and after some pixels
manipulation they should see the image preview after the changes and
downl
Chris Withers wrote:
This is an error from the ZEO client. Can you have a look in your
storage server's log and find the corresponding error (match the
date/time). It'll hopefully hold some more clues...
It must be this one:
2005-12-09T18:46:04 INFO(0) zrpc-conn(S):127.0.0.1:33828 zeoLoad()
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
|
| Handing over ownership to the ZF and therefore having signed a
| Contributor Agreement are the terms of the svn.zope.org repository, just
| like that code is to be made ZPL.
The license part is irrelevant after you've signed over the
+---[ Chris Withers ]--
| Andrew Milton wrote:
| >| In a ZSQL Method, I have tablename.
| >| and I get tablename.'species_value', what I need is
| >| tablename."species_value". Any idea how I can get Zope/ZSQL to not
| >| put in the single quotes (or use double quotes)?
| >
> Jason C. Leach
> In a ZSQL Method, I have tablename.
> and I get tablename.'species_value', what I need is
> tablename."species_value". Any idea how I can get Zope/ZSQL to not
> put in the single quotes (or use double quotes)?
JL.
___
Zope maillist
Andrew Milton wrote:
> +---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
> |
> | Handing over ownership to the ZF and therefore having signed a
> | Contributor Agreement are the terms of the svn.zope.org repository, just
> | like that code is to be made ZPL.
>
> The license part is irre
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>Andrew Milton wrote:
>
>
>>+---[ Stephan Richter ]--
>>| Hello everyone,
>>|
>>| With the development of Zope 3, the Zope developers committed to a new
>>| development process and higher software quality guidelines. With the
>>adoption
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 04:31:03PM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
Hi Stephan,
This seems to me a great step forward but I am missing something.
The quality is measured by a number of metrics, but it seems nowhere is
actually measured if the software does what it is supposed to do, if it is
clear
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
|
| > | * putting a project/package under the wings of the ZF ensures long-term
| > | IP protection
| >
| > How? I think my death + 70 years is further away than the death of ZF, or in
| > fact the death of Zope.
|
| But the end of your
Andrew Milton wrote:
> +---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
> |
> | > | * putting a project/package under the wings of the ZF ensures long-term
> | > | IP protection
> | >
> | > How? I think my death + 70 years is further away than the death of ZF, or
> in
> | > fact the de
I seem to have confused myself with the replies.
Check into Repository not required for Certification.
--
Andrew Milton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encodin
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
|
| > The proposal currently requires 3rd party code to be handed over to Zope
| > Foundation[1] AND checked into the ZF svn repository in order to be
| > 'certified'. You indicated this was indeed the case.
|
| I did absolutely not. In
Haj,
myBannerProduct 1.0 won´t install properly on Zope
2.7.4/SuSE9.3.
After untar and Restart of Zope there is only an empty
myBannerProduct Folder in "Installed Products".
Additionally at de-install of the corrupt Product i
get this:
ZODB Could not import class 'myAdMan' from module
'*OEpEfZxd1Z
On Monday 20 February 2006 19:24, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> My immediate concern is about resources: Who will have the time or
> incentive to police the common repository and grant certification? It
> seems to be a non-trivial process that may end up being quite
> time-consuming. It may be perceived a
On Monday 20 February 2006 20:09, Andrew Milton wrote:
> So in order to even get your Open Source package LISTED, you have to sign
> over the rights of your code to Zope Corp (currently, Zope Foundation
> later), and then check it into the svn respository.
>
> Is this is correct?
NO! ABSOLUTELY NO
On Monday 20 February 2006 23:16, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> No. The common repository under the wings of ZC/ZF is just *a*
> repository that implements the ZSCP. There can be others, for example
> the Plone repository, the collective repository (perhaps), etc.
Correct.
> I had earlier su
On Monday 20 February 2006 23:55, Andrew Milton wrote:
Wow, you took the following two quotes out of context.
>
> The Common Repository is *not* a replacement for other high-level
> repositories like Plone's or ECM's. It does not aim at assimilating
> everything in the wider Zope community. It is
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 03:57, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Putting stuff into svn.zope.org *does* have advantages:
>
> * it's easy to feed packages upstream to Zope for a later inclusion into
> a Zope distribution.
>
> * putting a project/package under the wings of the ZF ensures long-te
Okay, this discussion is off-topic. I will not respond to it, unless I read
about something that relates directly to the proposal.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
__
Hi
I've created simple view that just displays few lines of text (with
national characters)
and URL of the current page (which is received by call to my product
method (code below)).
I'm using UTF-8. I've used REQUEST.URL0 to generate url. The problem is
when
I'm accessing my object via it's n
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 05:59, Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
> This seems to me a great step forward but I am missing something.
> The quality is measured by a number of metrics, but it seems nowhere is
> actually measured if the software does what it is supposed to do, if it is
> clear how it wor
I hate to cross-post this, but would it be possible to limit this
discussion to a single list (e.g. zope3-dev, maybe)? I'm interested
in this topic, but my mail client isn't smart enough to filter it out
to only one place and I'm sure there are a lot of other people with
the same issue.
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 05:13, Andrew Milton wrote:
> Why should Mark Shuttleworth who has plenty of means, hand over IP for
> (parts of) SchoolTool? I'm sure he has more than enough ways to protect his
> IP. Or are you saying that it makes sense for ZF/ZC to protect him?
The reason the School
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 05:30, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Anyways, you're welcome to contribute code to the z3base if you'd prefer
> a public repository that doesn't require IP handover/sharing. Who knows,
> perhaps we'll even manage to implement the ZSCP for some packages there :).
Th
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 07:15, Andrew Milton wrote:
> The proposal currently requires 3rd party code to be handed over to Zope
> Foundation[1] AND checked into the ZF svn repository in order to be
> 'certified'. You indicated this was indeed the case.
That's not true. Phillip and I both negate
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:47, whit wrote:
> what hopefully zscp would do is allow a code commons at one end (ala
> collective, easy entry, friendly to experimentation) and a fully
> certified set of components at the other.
>
> In between, there would be well defined process for how software m
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 05:38, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
> However, I believe like you Philipp, that both initiatives should be
> decoupled.
The two things are decoupled as section 2 does not require section 3. I
decided to leave it in the same document for several reasons:
(1) Bandwidth. Dis
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 09:48, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I hate to cross-post this, but would it be possible to limit this
> discussion to a single list (e.g. zope3-dev, maybe)? I'm interested
> in this topic, but my mail client isn't smart enough to filter it out
> to only one place and
Hi Chris,
> Fernando Martins wrote:
> > I'm using LocalFS 1.7rc? and Zope 2.8.? in a Suse system. More
> importantly
> > for this case, zope is behind Apache 1.39 with module NTLM,
>
> What are you using to do NTLM?
simply mod_ntlm. I'm following the procedure on this page to do single
sign-on fo
Did I ask if it accepted cookie? No, I asked if it accepts http basic
auth. Care to answer my question? ;-)
Yes. The Google Mini accepts http basic auth.
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross pos
Stephan Richter wrote:
>(2) I fear that the ZSCP would be talked to death and stay dead. My experience
>in the Open Source world has shown that if something does not have
>practicality, it dies unless someone is getting paid. I am certainly not
>getting paid for this. By biggest interest here i
38 matches
Mail list logo
