I am working with zope mysql.
I have a table with SERIAL column type, I create z-sql method for insert
operation, how can I get the value for the auto increment column?
I know that in mysql I can call last_insert_id(), how do I call it, should I
create another z sql method and if I do,
On 11.06.09 14:36, Merav Ben-David wrote:
I am working with zope mysql.
I have a table with SERIAL column type, I create “z-sql method” for
insert operation, how can I get the value for the auto increment column?
I know that in mysql I can call last_insert_id(), how do I call it,
I am suspecting that serial in MySQL works like serial in PostgreSQL in which
a sequence is automatically created. If so, you should be able to query the
last_value field in the sequence without having to call the function. The
field
name might be different in MySQL, I don't know. This will
2009/6/11 Aleksey Tsalolikhin atsaloli.t...@gmail.com:
I am trying to figure out how move this beastie over with all its data and
all its users.
Zope typically stores all it's data in a database called ZODB. It
stores everything in a file called Data.fs.
Copy it over from the old server to the
Log message for revision 100877:
ZODB 3.9.0b2
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/branches/2.12/versions.cfg 2009-06-11 17:15:39 UTC (rev 100876)
+++
Log message for revision 100878:
updated to ZODB 3.0.0b2
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst 2009-06-11 17:28:08 UTC
Log message for revision 100879:
ZODB==3.9.0b2
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2009-06-11 17:29:27 UTC (rev 100878)
+++ Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
Log message for revision 100891:
Updated to zope.testing = 3.7.5 and ZConfig = 2.7.0
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
---
Log message for revision 100892:
Updated the KGS to match the list of packages used during alltests
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2009-06-11
Log message for revision 100893:
Two older zope.* packages were not listed in the versions.cfg
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2009-06-12 00:07:07
2009/6/10 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com:
This effort could be the focus of a sprint team, if there was interest.
Indexing fascinates me. I would be up for putting down some effort on
some sort of improved indexing. I'm not sure how much of the time I
would help and how much I would be in the
Hi there,
I see we have a grok sprint working towards grok 1.0 at the EP.
I'd like to spend my sprinting time on ZTK issues which currently
include:
- Organisational stuff (Bug tracking, things listed in steering group
topic list)
- Further improvements to package dependencies
If anybody wants
Hello,
I'm trying to understand how we are using the bug tracker.
I noticed that on Launchpad right now there are both umbrella projects
such as Zope2 and Zope3, and individual projects such as
zope.app.form and zope.testing -- but the list of those
subprojects is very far from comprehensive.
I
On 10.06.09 18:10, Tres Seaver wrote:
This is somewhat the same pattern as Andreas used to merge the ZPT
implementations, I think. This effort could be the focus of a sprint
team, if there was interest.
The better example is TXNG3 where the Zope 2 and Zope 3 parts were
completely refactored
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
I propose that we consider merging the two implementations, along the
lines of the following:
1. Review the change history of the two codebases since the original
fork, porting relevant changes from the Z2 indexes to the
On 2009-06-11, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
I see we have a grok sprint working towards grok 1.0 at the EP.
For those that haven't seen it:
http://reinout.vanrees.org/weblog/2009/06/09/grok-europython-sprint.html
I'd like to spend my sprinting time on ZTK issues which currently
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Jun 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jun 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Jun 10 20:45:44 EDT 2009
URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
Log message for revision 94907:
backport r94905 to 2.10: Acquisition wrappers now correctly proxy
`__iter__`.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.10/doc/CHANGES.txt
U
On Jun 11, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
It looking for the ZODBMountPoint object that Tarek refered to, I saw
that there is still a Mount module in the ZODB package. AFAIK, this
a fossil that never should have been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
It looking for the ZODBMountPoint object that Tarek refered to, I saw
that there is still a Mount module in the ZODB package. AFAIK, this
a fossil that never should have been included in ZODB in the first
place. I'm going
On 11.06.09 20:10, Tres Seaver wrote:
This doctest is failing for me in an up-to-date checkout of the 2.10
branch. Andreas, can you please investigate?
No failures for me with fresh 2.10 checkouts on Linux and Mac.
Andreas
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd.
On Jun 2, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Miles Waller wrote:
...
3. ZRS
If I'm right, ZRS still has a limitation in that there is a single
server
for writes.
Yup.
...
Having read the factsheet, I'm a
bit unsure as to how it is functionally different from ZeoRAID - can
anyone
explain?
I'm not
On 11.06.09 22:14, Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 11.06.09 20:10, Tres Seaver wrote:
This doctest is failing for me in an up-to-date checkout of the 2.10
branch. Andreas, can you please investigate?
No failures for me with fresh 2.10 checkouts on Linux and Mac.
23 matches
Mail list logo
