On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:16:38 -0800, Paul Carduner wrote:
it would be nice if these docs could somehow magically appear on the
plone site (I'm told plone has some product for syncing content from
subversion?).
http://dev.plone.org/collective/browser/FSReST
I was going to ask this question anyway, but perhaps it's more timely with
the scheduled server move:
Has anyone made a git clone of svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main suitable for
public mirroring on github, etc.?
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Would it be possible to have a non-system python installed (by default
into /opt/python24) by the system python easy_install? I think it would be
useful to have eggs that provide commands on the path such as
easy_install_nonsystem24, virtualenv_nonsystem24, python_nonsystem24. With
a better
Jim Fulton wrote:
Binaries, except for Windows, should never never be uploaded to PyPI (or
download.zope.org). There are just too many variables to building
binaries.
Yes, that's what I meant to ask for, PILwoTk-1.1.6.3 to PyPI as a source
release. I'm currently using
Would someone be willing to add the PILwoTk-1.1.6.3(-py2.4-linux-i686).egg
to PyPI?
If PILwoTk becomes a PyPI entry, I'd like to ask a follow-up on the Plone
list to see if ploneout buildouts can/should by default depend on PILwoTk
to satisfy Plone-3.0's PIL dependency.
I'm able to use PILwoTk
Something in z3c.formdemo r77305 gives the following error (r77253 builds
and runs):
$ ./bin/buildout
Develop: '/software/formdemo/.'
Develop: '/software/formdemo/z3c.form'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /tmp/tmpeS3r2n, line 10, in ?
execfile('/software/formdemo/z3c.form')
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:42:35 -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
Yes, thanks for the report. Cheeseshop was slow on Friday, so I could not try
the package. I just released formdemo 1.1.1, which fixes the problem.
Thanks for the z3c.form package and the demo.
There is an optionalChoiceField addition
What does the twice-annual release policy say about bugs and/or packaging
errors that are identified and fixed within a very short time of the
official release announcement?
Log message for revision 41228:
Merge r41227 from 2.9 branch:
Update Five to bugfix release 1.3.1.
Andreas Jung wrote:
I'll raise the question again: what are the benefits of the HelpSys for
a Zope user?
I can't recall clicking on top frame of the ZMI or a 'Help!' link in the
past few years, either. Perhaps an equivalent or greater benefit would be
to rip out locally installed static help
I didn't receive any feedback on zope-general, but it could just be a
problem with my environment that fails silently. Can anyone confirm that
this isn't pilot error before I file a bug? Thanks.
---
I'm having some trouble with the 'make install' stage of Zope-2.9 svn.
Using python-2.4.2 on
I'm having some trouble with the 'make install' stage of Zope-2.9 svn.
Using python-2.4.2 on Gentoo linux. Zope-2.9.0b1 installed fine, but I
needed the fix for get_transaction() ASAP.
URL: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branches/2.9
Revision: 40780
# ./configure
Most references I find (google, The Plone Book - McKay, Building Websites
W/ Plone - Cooper) on virtual hosting Zope behind Apache recommend
starting with sfm's SiteAccess enhanced Virtual Host Monster product:
http://www.zope.org/Members/sfm/SiteAccessEnhanced/view
Reportedly last updated
Shane Graber wrote:
I'm looking for an e-commerce solution for Zope / Plone. My specific
requirements are that we want to make available files for download that
customers would have to pay for before they could download them. Does
anyone have any suggestions on what Zope and/or Plone products
Malcolm Cleaton wrote:
The only thing I can think of which matches your symptoms is this. Is it
possible you have misconfigured this new Zope 2.8 instance, and it's
trying to use direct access to the Data.fs via FileStorage, instead of
contacting zeo?
I feel like a guy who brought the lawn
I am trying to use 'zopectl debug' for the first time with zope-2.8.0,
local ZEO setup. It worked fine with zope-2.7.x and earlier. I am now
getting a file locking error on Data.fs.lock, which stops the debug
initialization at that point. The problem occurs whether I run zopectl as
root or as the
Chris McDonough wrote:
File permissions. The user who is the effective user does not have
permission to overwrite the Data.fs.lock file.
effective-user zope
# /var/lib/zope/zope-2.8.0/var $ ls -al
drwxr-xr-x 3 zope zope 336 Jul 4 14:59 .
drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 280 Jun 25 03:08
Chris McDonough wrote:
If you dont think it's file permissions, one thing this could also be...
is your data.fs on an NFS partition? flock doesn't work well on NFS.
This is a local ReiserFS partition. The zope and zeo are on the local
machine, communicating over port .
I just checked, and
I forgot to check event.log, that gives information about the problem.
Thanks.
2004-01-17T17:07:23 PROBLEM(100) ZODB FS FS21 warn: Ignoring
index for /var/zope/var/Data.fs
--
2004-01-17T17:07:24 INFO(0) Zope Ready to handle requests
--
2004-01-17T17:07:48 PROBLEM(100) Zope Security
I'm not sure whether the collector issue 1164 I posted is simply a
missing configuration step on my part. At any rate, I'm still unable to
start the current checkout of Zope HEAD. The only edit I make to
/var/zope/etc/zope.conf is 'effective-user zuser', and the problem below
also occurs if I
With the RH7.3 release today, the default Python2 installation is that
much more likely to be Python 2.2 (it's the base package in RH7.3),
instead of Python 2.1.
Rather than ask the FAQ of why and what parts of Zope can't handle
Python 2.2, I'll ask if there is, or suggest if there isn't, a
From the Daily-URL: Andrew Kuchling: Medusa 0.5.1 released: Medusa is a
framework for writing asynchronous socket-based servers. It was
originally written by Sam Rushing. However, no new releases have been
made in about a year. I've therefore taken the original Medusa package,
and reformatted the
[Chris] Does Zope 3 use Medusa at all?
[Stephan] No. Shane rewrote all of the HTTP Server and I am writing
right now the FTP
server (which copies some of the Medusa code, but much is cleaned). We
added interfaces and made it more component-based.
[Jeff] That's good news about an interface
I was wondering if there was any consensus on how best to fix or
compensate for the unfortunate behaviour of IE6 with regards to the
width calculation of textarea boxes. For anyone who hasn't seen it, the
full-width texareas that are everywhere in the ZMI suddenly started
pushing the width out in
I'm curious what the impact on overall performance would be if products
eventually came into existence that extended Zope to directly handle
additional protocols and their data requirements, primarily intended for
low-volume workgroup kind of traffic.
Jabber, IMAP and LDAP are the ones that come
[Eron] Yeah, this is something I'd be very interested in knowing, too.
In fact, this particular ability could make or break a community project
I'm going to be developing with Zope in the near future. Do you mean
like the pluggable access that ZServer provides? I imagine there would
also have to
[Jeff] You're right, I wonder if this is a documented change in IE6, or
a bug they plan to fix? I can't imagine in what universe that including
the scrollbar-obscured area in the 100% width makes sense. I'd hate to
see all browsers' HTML get munged to cover this bug up. But given the
On my Zope 2.5.0 running on WindowsXP/IE6, the ZMI's textarea boxes, for
things like editing PageTemplates, becomes too wide for the frame when
the vertical scrollbar is required, causing an inconvenient
side-scrolling behavior. The frame must be scrolled sideways to view the
text areas's
I was thinking there would be a default table where everything gets
stored by default. A programmer then tells the ORMapping about
specific classes and how to store them.
I wouldn't think it would be practical to use unless the ORMapping
managed the tables by examining the class signature
28 matches
Mail list logo
