> > My configuration looks like this:
> >
> > ProxyRequests On
What do you need ProxyRequests for?
On my machine, they are off, and it works.
> > ProxyPassReverse /paginas/ http://200.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/
> > ProxyPassReverse /p_/ http://200.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/p_/
> > ProxyPassReverse /misc_/ http:/
Christiano Anderson wrote:
> Do you have any example of the best Apache and ProxyCache configuration to
> running zope?
>
> My configuration looks like this:
>
>
> ProxyRequests On
> #ProxyReceiveBufferSize 65536
> ProxyReceiveBufferSize 0
> CacheRoot "/www/proxycache"
> CacheSize 5000
> Cache
Why do you see any need to turn ProxyRequests On?
I run the ProxyPass too, but there is no need for the ProxyRequest and the
Proxy module. Perhaps there lies your problem.
-goe-
>My configuration looks like this:
>
>
>ProxyRequests On
>#ProxyReceiveBufferSize 65536
>ProxyReceiveBufferSize 0
>Ca
t;J. Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 4:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope is very slow!
>
> > We did some pretty heavy performance testing of a particar application
> comparing
> > 2.1.6 and 2.2.0 and 2.2.0 wa
>
> > From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Organization: New Information Paradigms
> > Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:15:57 +0100
> > To: Andy McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "J. Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > S
ent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope is very slow!
> We did some pretty heavy performance testing of a particar application
comparing
> 2.1.6 and 2.2.0 and 2.2.0 was slower in most cases. The testing was done
on a
> Celeron533 128Meg RAM running RH6.1.
>
>
gestions.
>
> J
>
> > From: Christiano Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:12:00 -0300 (BRT)
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Zope] Zope is very slow!
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is my first message to the l
. I suggest trying that and seeing if it makes a difference.
J
> From: Christiano Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:36:42 -0300 (BRT)
> To: "J. Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope is very slow
> I am pretty sure (61%) that in the original release of 2.2.0 there was
> something about a speed increase. One talked about on single processor
> (20-40%) and the other was dual processor (60-80%). It partly
> has to do with
> that "one line of magic code" in the z2.py.
>
> Ethan? Paul? DC? Ca
re to shed some light?
J
> From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: New Information Paradigms
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:15:57 +0100
> To: Andy McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "J. Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
Andy McKay wrote:
>
> > Upgrade to 2.2.1 (60% faster on dual processors).
>
> Really? I didnt see anything about this in the Changes file... has something
> else changed I didnt see? I noticed that 2.1.6 wasnt making the best use of
> dual processors.
I thought only ZEO would make good use fo d
> Upgrade to 2.2.1 (60% faster on dual processors).
Really? I didnt see anything about this in the Changes file... has something
else changed I didnt see? I noticed that 2.1.6 wasnt making the best use of
dual processors.
--
Andy McKay, Developer, ActiveState
http://www.ActiveState.com
.
Just some suggestions.
J
> From: Christiano Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:12:00 -0300 (BRT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Zope] Zope is very slow!
>
> Hi,
>
> This is my first message to the list...
>
> I'm currently
Hi,
This is my first message to the list...
I'm currently running Zope 2.1.6 + Apache 1.3.12 (with proxycache). The
system is a Solaris 5.6 on a E450 with 2GB Ram and 2 X 450mhz...
The Zope is running with Apache, using the ProxyCache and SiteAccess to
convert all requests from port 8080 to 8
14 matches
Mail list logo
