On 2/13/06, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We might add a new TypeInformation derivative, which knows about the
addable Z3 content.
My tests last year indicated that this was not enough, if I remember
correctly. The FTI stuff might need a bit if refactoing as well,
although I don't
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alec Mitchell's plone_schemas product lets you use such types in Plone,
though he derives from CMF's PortalContent (as I recall) and manually
constructs an FTI.
FWIW, I think this is an exceptionally bad idea.
I'd much prefer to see CMF grow a way to use Z3 content types
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
mhammond
- Windows DevelopmentMode penalty in CMFCore.DirectoryView,
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/366
Pending / Deferred Issues
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alec Mitchell's plone_schemas product lets you use such types in Plone,
though he derives from CMF's PortalContent (as I recall) and manually
constructs an FTI.
FWIW, I think this is an exceptionally bad idea.
I'd much
Hi Chris!
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alec Mitchell's plone_schemas product lets you use such types in
Plone, though he derives from CMF's PortalContent (as I recall) and
manually constructs an FTI.
FWIW, I think this is an exceptionally bad idea.
I'd much prefer to see CMF
yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The underlying question is whether we want to drop support for TTW
development. I don't want that. So I prefer to keep portal types and
Actions until we have a suitable Z3 replacement.
In my own opinion, there are three levels of TTW development:
1. TTW
