Previously Tres Seaver wrote:
> Alec Mitchell wrote:
> > On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Dieter Maurer wrote:
> >>> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
> ...
> ... deprecation of "getToolByName" ...
> which is that there's no practical reason other
On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dieter Maurer wrote:
>>> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
...
... deprecation of "getToolByName" ...
which is that there's no practical r
On 4/15/07, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dieter Maurer wrote:
>>> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
...
... deprecation of "getToolByName"
Alec Mitchell wrote:
On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
...
... deprecation of "getToolByName" ...
which is that there's no practical reason other than
aesthetics to deprecate getToolByName at this point.
A v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dieter Maurer wrote:
>>> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
...
... deprecation of "getToolByName" ...
which is that there's no practical reason ot
On 4/15/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
>> ...
>> ... deprecation of "getToolByName" ...
>> which is that there's no practical reason other than
>> aesthetics to deprecate getToolByName at this point.
>
> A very goo
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I have a suspicion that this will be easy for most utilities. We can
put that framework in place for CMF 2.1 and start refactoring the tools
into utilities on CMF trunk.
A quick look seems that there are a few common uses of acquisitio
Previously Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I have a suspicion that this will be easy for most utilities. We can
> put that framework in place for CMF 2.1 and start refactoring the tools
> into utilities on CMF trunk.
A quick look seems that there are a few common uses of acquisition in
the tools: to get
Previously Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
> > Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> >> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:16:23 -0400, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> yuppie wro
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:16:23 -0400, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Kapil's also right when he says that utilities by princi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:16:23 -0400, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>
>>> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Kapil's also right when he says that utilities
Rob Miller wrote:
i'll add yet another "me too" to this chorus. removing getToolByName has
become considerably more trouble than it's worth. currently, i see basically
two options being suggested:
- adding (and then living with) yet more code in Five, which changes the
behaviour of clean,
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote at 2007-4-12 06:59 -0700:
...
... deprecation of "getToolByName" ...
which is that there's no practical reason other than
aesthetics to deprecate getToolByName at this point.
A very good point: let's deprecate deprecations done just for
aethetical reaso
Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:16:23 -0400, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Kapil's also right when he says that utilities by principle are
context-less components.
By principle all Zope 3 code might depend on setSite t
Balazs Ree wrote:
Acquisition is raping Zope3, it seems.
That must surely be quotation of the month. :)
Martin
___
Zope-CMF maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug repo
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sat Apr 14 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Sun Apr 15 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were no messages.
___
Zope-CMF maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
dreamcatcher
- "setChainForPortalTypes doesn't allow to set default chain",
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/475
mhammond
- "Win
17 matches
Mail list logo
