[Zope-CMF] CMF Collector: Open Issues

2007-08-07 Thread tseaver
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF). Assigned and Open tseaver - CMF needs View-based TypeInformation, [Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/437 yuppie - purge_old in runAllImportSteps

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: - The exports created by the new components handler are still flawed, ISiteRoot and placeless components are not exported correctly. I'm quite sure I fixed that: I was able to export the components and import them

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: - The exports created by the new components handler are still flawed, ISiteRoot and placeless components are not exported correctly. I'm quite sure I fixed that: I was able to export the components and import them

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: I'm supposed to do a CMF 2.1.0 release today, but the state of these issues is unclear. Wichert, did you look at it? There are no checkins into either CMF or GS as far as I can see. Export now yields this: I took care of the GenericSetup changes as far as I

[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread yuppie
Hi! Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: - The exports created by the new components handler are still flawed, ISiteRoot and placeless components are not exported correctly. I'm quite sure I fixed that: I was able to export the

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously yuppie wrote: Hi! Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: - The exports created by the new components handler are still flawed, ISiteRoot and placeless components are not exported correctly. I'm quite sure I fixed

[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread yuppie
Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: I get something else: if I import this: utility interface=foo.IBar factory=foo.bar/ the export looks like this: utility interface=foo.IBar object=/ That seems to be a similar but different bug. this is caused by

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously yuppie wrote: The check for aq_base should be fine, but your example shows a second issue: type() is used to get the factory. That only works if the class is the factory. So there seems to be indeed a need to store somewhere the factory name :( I think we need that to get the

[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread yuppie
Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: The check for aq_base should be fine, but your example shows a second issue: type() is used to get the factory. That only works if the class is the factory. So there seems to be indeed a need to store somewhere the factory name :( I think we

[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 11 OK

2007-08-07 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Aug 6 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Tue Aug 7 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 11 messages: 11 from CMF Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Mon Aug 6 21:33:32 EDT

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: The check for aq_base should be fine, but your example shows a second issue: type() is used to get the factory. That only works if the class is the factory. So there seems to be indeed a need to store somewhere the

[Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread yuppie
Hi! Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously yuppie wrote: The check for aq_base should be fine, but your example shows a second issue: type() is used to get the factory. That only works if the class is the factory. So there seems to be indeed a

Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Plone needs a release this week

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Hi! Previously yuppie wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: But we can't know if component or factory is used. What if someone uses a factory which returns a component with a __module__ set? Don't know what __module__ usually looks like if the component is created at registration time. I did

[Zope-CMF] GS bug

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
I want to look at http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/6855 before we tag GS 1.3.1; it might be a GenericSetup bug. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.

Re: [Zope-CMF] GS bug

2007-08-07 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Wichert Akkerman wrote: I want to look at http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/6855 before we tag GS 1.3.1; it might be a GenericSetup bug. This turned out to be a bug in plone.app.form. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]It is simple to make things.