Previously yuppie wrote: > Wichert Akkerman wrote: > >Previously yuppie wrote: > >>The check for aq_base should be fine, but your example shows a second > >>issue: type() is used to get the factory. That only works if the class > >>is the factory. > >> > >>So there seems to be indeed a need to store somewhere the factory name :( > > > >I think we need that to get the export of placeless components as well. > >Without it I can't seem to think of a way to determine how the component > >should be created: using a factory method (which could be the class > >type itself) or some other way. > > If 'factory' is used, I also can't see a way to determine the factory > used on import. > > If 'component' is used, there might be a solution: __module__ should be > set correctly. Maybe we can loop through the objects in the module and > compare them with our component?
But we can't know if component or factory is used. What if someone uses a factory which returns a component with a __module__ set? > But if we have to keep track of registrations anyway, it might be better > to do this for all kinds of registrations instead of using a hack. That is my preference. I have added a statement to REAMDE.txt indicating that export of placeless utilies is not supported at the moment. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests