Previously yuppie wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >Previously yuppie wrote:
> >>The check for aq_base should be fine, but your example shows a second
> >>issue: type() is used to get the factory. That only works if the class
> >>is the factory.
> >>So there seems to be indeed a need to store somewhere the factory name :(
> >I think we need that to get the export of placeless components as well.
> >Without it I can't seem to think of a way to determine how the component
> >should be created: using a factory method (which could be the class
> >type itself) or some other way.
> If 'factory' is used, I also can't see a way to determine the factory
> used on import.
> If 'component' is used, there might be a solution: __module__ should be
> set correctly. Maybe we can loop through the objects in the module and
> compare them with our component?
But we can't know if component or factory is used. What if someone uses
a factory which returns a component with a __module__ set?
> But if we have to keep track of registrations anyway, it might be better
> to do this for all kinds of registrations instead of using a hack.
That is my preference. I have added a statement to REAMDE.txt indicating
that export of placeless utilies is not supported at the moment.
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests