-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Patterson wrote:
> Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ross Patterson wrote:
>>> Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 23.11.2008 11:57 Uhr, Charlie Clark wrote:
>> Am 23.11.2008 um 09:24 schri
Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ross Patterson wrote:
>> Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Andreas Jung wrote:
On 23.11.2008 11:57 Uhr, Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am 23.11.2008 um 09:24 schrieb Andreas Jung:
>
>> This issue is independent of the client-side. ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Patterson wrote:
> Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> On 23.11.2008 11:57 Uhr, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 23.11.2008 um 09:24 schrieb Andreas Jung:
> This issue is independent of the client-side. ab2 a
Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> On 23.11.2008 11:57 Uhr, Charlie Clark wrote:
>>> Am 23.11.2008 um 09:24 schrieb Andreas Jung:
>>>
This issue is independent of the client-side. ab2 and cmf/plone were
running on the same (fast) machine.
>>>
>>> Is this rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 23.11.2008 11:57 Uhr, Charlie Clark wrote:
>> Am 23.11.2008 um 09:24 schrieb Andreas Jung:
>>
>>> This issue is independent of the client-side. ab2 and cmf/plone were
>>> running on the same (fast) machine.
>>
>> Is this really
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Sat Nov 22 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Sun Nov 23 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.5 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Sat Nov 22 21:02:00 EST 2008
URL: ht
On 23.11.2008 11:57 Uhr, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 23.11.2008 um 09:24 schrieb Andreas Jung:
This issue is independent of the client-side. ab2 and cmf/plone were
running on the same (fast) machine.
Is this really content that is suited for the ZODB?
I am talking of the standard content-type
Am 23.11.2008 um 09:24 schrieb Andreas Jung:
> This issue is independent of the client-side. ab2 and cmf/plone were
> running on the same (fast) machine.
Is this really content that is suited for the ZODB? I'm just thinking
of an environment with lots of concurrent writes and content
manage
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-11-23 09:24 +0100:
> ...
>> Have you profiled an individual request to learn what the time is spent for?
>>
>> If the time is dominated by client side activity, you need client side
>> skaling to increase the throughput significantly.
>
>>
>> If, on the other hand, the ti
On 23.11.2008 9:17 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-11-21 07:31 +0100:
... write performance ...
However the transaction size does not
seem to have any impact on the number of simulataneous writes.
Have you profiled an individual request to learn what the time is spent for?
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-11-21 07:31 +0100:
> ... write performance ...
>However the transaction size does not
>seem to have any impact on the number of simulataneous writes.
Have you profiled an individual request to learn what the time is spent for?
If the time is dominated by client side ac
On 22.11.2008 15:39 Uhr, Charlie Clark wrote:
Hi Andreas,
a very interesting situation. I've never thought of object creation
when choosing "pure" CMF over Plone as this is largely a ZODB issue.
As Roché points out it is less likely to be the transactions and more
likely to be the cataloguing
Charlie Clark wrote at 2008-11-20 20:33 +0100:
> ...
>Agreed. If third party tools have problems, then they should provide
>the solutions.
The Plone people are much more open to integrate third party solutions
(a good thing in principle). But, they have only limited control
over third party solu
13 matches
Mail list logo