Re: [Zope-CMF] GenericSetup backport
Le 26/04/11 12:04, Hanno Schlichting a écrit : > Most tests failed as the ZCA now has to be setup before calling > certain API's like "profile_registry.registerProfile". It's been a > very common pattern in Plone add-ons to call this on the module level > of a test to register a "test-only" profile. > > We have adjusted most of the test layers for the recent Plone release, > so the change can stay in the 1.6.x series from my point of view. But > if would be a lot of pain to do this for Plone 3.x releases using > GenericSetup 1.4. > > Hanno I'd like to move on this. Lemme explain the context. One of our customers has a Plone 3 application for which we would like to add more tests before migrating to Plone 4. Some of the programmers that would do the work have never written Plone tests and we need to bring them up to speed. plone.app.testing (p.a.t) is imo much simpler to learn than PTC/ZTC magic. Reason why we would like our programmers to use p.a.t and why we backported p.a.t to Plone 3. Now that GenericSetup delegates its registries management to ZCA, p.a.t 4.x has been refactored to be even simpler. This refactoring has also been backported successfully to p.a.t 3.x. I'd like to make a release of p.a.t 3.x but it does need to depend on a GS-1.4 release that delegates its registries to ZCA. A long introduction for a simple question : Would anyone see an issue that I release a Products.GenericSetup 1.4.20 (or any other big integer) with ZCA registries ? Smaller 1.4.x numbers could be kept for bug fix releases for CMF 2.1 and Plone 3. p.a.t 3.x would then state a dependency >= 1.4.20 -- Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] GenericSetup backport
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote: > Would anyone see an issue that I release a Products.GenericSetup 1.4.20 > (or any other big integer) with ZCA registries ? > > Smaller 1.4.x numbers could be kept for bug fix releases for CMF 2.1 and > Plone 3. That's a really weird way of doing it. And I'm a -1 on that. Why don't you just cut a branch of GenericSetup 1.4 with your changes and make a private (vendor) release of it? Then put the private release up on some Web server serving a flat directory, including it into the buildout via find-links? We do that all the time, see for example http://dist.jarn.com/public/ Hanno ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] GenericSetup backport
Le 26/05/11 17:15, Hanno Schlichting a écrit : > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Godefroid Chapelle > wrote: >> Would anyone see an issue that I release a Products.GenericSetup 1.4.20 >> (or any other big integer) with ZCA registries ? >> >> Smaller 1.4.x numbers could be kept for bug fix releases for CMF 2.1 and >> Plone 3. > > That's a really weird way of doing it. And I'm a -1 on that. I agree it is a bit weird, I am just trying to be creative to comply with your request of preserving Plone 3 tests. Outside being weird, can you explain issues you have ? > > Why don't you just cut a branch of GenericSetup 1.4 with your changes > and make a private (vendor) release of it? > > Then put the private release up on some Web server serving a flat > directory, including it into the buildout via find-links? We do that > all the time, see for example http://dist.jarn.com/public/ I obviously thought of an egg on our own server. Nevertheless, at least Vitaliy Podoba from Quintagroup also uses p.a.testing 3.x and I'd like him (and others) to be able to also use p.a.testing released eggs. Further, I think it is a real advantage for the product developers if they can migrate their tests to p.a.testing while keeping Plone 3 compatibility. > Hanno Gotcha ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 4
This is the summary for test reports received on the cmf-tests list between 2011-05-25 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-05-26 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds Reports received CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux CMF-2.2 Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux CMF-trunk Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux Non-OK results -- ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] GenericSetup backport
On 5/26/11 10:39 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote: [..] > > Further, I think it is a real advantage for the product developers if > they can migrate their tests to p.a.testing while keeping Plone 3 > compatibility. FWIW: whatever the solution ends up being I'd welcome such an option as well. Raphael > >> Hanno > > Gotcha > ___ > Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org > https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf > > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
