-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 13, 2008, at 15:28 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> Question: Wouldn't it make sense to enable the new action icons
> functionality in the various templates to show icons if an expression
> for an icon is provided, and completely retire the CMFAction
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Sep 13, 2008, at 15:28 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
> > Question: Wouldn't it make sense to enable the new action icons
> > functionality in the various templates to show icons if an expression
> > for an ic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 18, 2008, at 09:56 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> I'm not the greatest artist in the world, if anyone dislikes a
>> particular icon please feel free to replace it with something that
>> makes sense to a normal user. Just make sure it has a transp
Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2008, at 09:56 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >> I'm not the greatest artist in the world, if anyone dislikes a
> >> particular icon please feel free to replace it with something that
> >> makes sense
Hi Jens!
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> This has now landed, in several chunks because it turned out to be
> more work and a larger change set than expected, on the CMF trunk.
> Silly me thinking most of my work was done when Yuppie thoughtfully
> added a icon URL expression property to the new-st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:13 , yuppie wrote:
>> - extend the "old-style" actions, those you see e.g. on a type
>> information "Actions" tab in the ZMI, to also have a field for an
>> icon
>> URL expression
>
> That might have been the most pragmatic
Previously yuppie wrote:
> I personally prefer to move all type info Actions to the actions tool. I
> can't see a need to specify separate 'view', 'edit' or 'metadata'
> Actions for each content type. That just makes it necessary to maintain
> a lot of redundant configuration data. In how many p
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Wed Sep 17 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Sep 18 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Wed Sep 17 21:27:43 EDT 2008
URL: htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2008, at 15:28 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
>> Question: Wouldn't it make sense to enable the new action icons
>> functionality in the various templates to show icons if an expression
>> for an icon is provided, and
Hi Wichert!
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously yuppie wrote:
>> I personally prefer to move all type info Actions to the actions tool. I
>> can't see a need to specify separate 'view', 'edit' or 'metadata'
>> Actions for each content type. That just makes it necessary to maintain
>> a lot of
yuppie-4 wrote:
>
> Hi Wichert!
>
>
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> Previously yuppie wrote:
>>> I personally prefer to move all type info Actions to the actions tool. I
>>> can't see a need to specify separate 'view', 'edit' or 'metadata'
>>> Actions for each content type. That just makes it
Hi Martin!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> yuppie-4 wrote:
>> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>> Previously yuppie wrote:
I personally prefer to move all type info Actions to the actions tool. I
can't see a need to specify separate 'view', 'edit' or 'metadata'
Actions for each content type. That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
> Hi Martin!
>
>
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> yuppie-4 wrote:
>>> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously yuppie wrote:
> I personally prefer to move all type info Actions to the actions tool. I
> can't see a need to specify separ
yuppie wrote at 2008-9-18 11:13 +0200:
> ...
>I personally prefer to move all type info Actions to the actions tool. I
>can't see a need to specify separate 'view', 'edit' or 'metadata'
>Actions for each content type. That just makes it necessary to maintain
>a lot of redundant configuration dat
14 matches
Mail list logo
