On 22 Sep 2005, at 12:55, pete wrote:
Thanks that has made everything much clearer. I'll make sure I
label clearly what conditions I've tested things under in future: I
hadn't fully appreciated that the head might have different
dependencies from the 1.5 branch, though the possibility see
Thanks that has made everything much clearer. I'll make sure I label
clearly what conditions I've tested things under in future: I hadn't
fully appreciated that the head might have different dependencies from
the 1.5 branch, though the possibility seems obvious now you've pointed
it out.
J
On 22 Sep 2005, at 11:55, computing project wrote:
Apologies! Although I had tested adding the configured site via
the ZMI several times (though only on 2.8), the removal of the two
lines in setuphandlers somehow got missed out when I posted the
code and patches.
It is true that I didn'
Apologies! Although I had tested adding the configured site via the ZMI
several times (though only on 2.8), the removal of the two lines in
setuphandlers somehow got missed out when I posted the code and patches.
It is true that I didn't try checking out a clean install, applying all the
patc