Hi Martin!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The underlying question is whether we want to drop support for TTW
development. I don't want that. So I prefer to keep portal types and
Actions until we have a suitable Z3 replacement.
In my own opinion, there are three
On 2/13/06, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We might add a new TypeInformation derivative, which knows about the
addable Z3 content.
My tests last year indicated that this was not enough, if I remember
correctly. The FTI stuff might need a bit if refactoing as well,
although I don't
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alec Mitchell's plone_schemas product lets you use such types in Plone,
though he derives from CMF's PortalContent (as I recall) and manually
constructs an FTI.
FWIW, I think this is an exceptionally bad idea.
I'd much
Hi Chris!
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alec Mitchell's plone_schemas product lets you use such types in
Plone, though he derives from CMF's PortalContent (as I recall) and
manually constructs an FTI.
FWIW, I think this is an exceptionally bad idea.
I'd much prefer to see CMF
yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The underlying question is whether we want to drop support for TTW
development. I don't want that. So I prefer to keep portal types and
Actions until we have a suitable Z3 replacement.
In my own opinion, there are three levels of TTW development:
1. TTW
Hi Martin!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Just trying to get an overview - are there any plans or code (CMF 2?) to
make it possible to use Z3 content types as first-class citizens in CMF?
That is, make them available in add menus, make actions/tabs appear on
them, let them use method aliases, make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
Hi Martin!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Just trying to get an overview - are there any plans or code (CMF 2?)
to make it possible to use Z3 content types as first-class citizens in
CMF? That is, make them available in add menus, make
On 2/11/06, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:04:39 -, Jens Vagelpohl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no such code right now and AFAIK no one has even looked at it.
If anyone wants to take this up and the proposal/code is accepted the
earliest target
