On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 23:42 +0200, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> Op 14-09-15 om 09:06 schreef Charlie Clark:
> > Am .09.2015, 16:57 Uhr, schrieb Maurits van Rees
> > :
> >
> > > Yes, Plone has switched over a long time ago. Plone 4.0 and
> > > higher,
> > > including Plone 5, have CMF 2.2. (Not 2.3,
Op 14-09-15 om 09:06 schreef Charlie Clark:
Am .09.2015, 16:57 Uhr, schrieb Maurits van Rees
:
Yes, Plone has switched over a long time ago. Plone 4.0 and higher,
including Plone 5, have CMF 2.2. (Not 2.3, for compatibility reasons
that I don't know.)
I can't remember the details myself. I
Am .09.2015, 16:57 Uhr, schrieb Maurits van Rees
:
Yes, Plone has switched over a long time ago. Plone 4.0 and higher,
including Plone 5, have CMF 2.2. (Not 2.3, for compatibility reasons
that I don't know.)
I can't remember the details myself. I don't think the API has changed
much.
Op 11-09-15 om 13:55 schreef Charlie Clark:
Am .09.2015, 13:02 Uhr, schrieb Johannes Raggam :
I wonder why Plone still depends on it, if the code was moved to other
CMF packages...?
I think Plone still hasn't switched to the version of CMF which has the
integration. I don't know the details b
Am .09.2015, 13:02 Uhr, schrieb Johannes Raggam :
I wonder why Plone still depends on it, if the code was moved to other
CMF packages...?
I think Plone still hasn't switched to the version of CMF which has the
integration. I don't know the details but I think there are things that
are done
I wonder why Plone still depends on it, if the code was moved to other
CMF packages...?
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 10:37 +0200, Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am .09.2015, 00:19 Uhr, schrieb Maurits van Rees
> :
>
> > Not in active development anymore, as the code was moved into other
> >
> > parts of CM
Am .09.2015, 00:19 Uhr, schrieb Maurits van Rees
:
Not in active development anymore, as the code was moved into other
parts of CMF years ago, but it made sense to me to move this one over
too.
Not to me, it doesn't. There should be no more work on this particular
library.
Charlie
--
