Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Jephte CLAIN writes:
> > I have the scenario where a user can edit *its* data but not other
> > users's data, unless he has a special role. however, the method used to
> > edit one's data is the same.
> Can you not use the "Owner" role for this?
I suppose not, because dat
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Offhand I would say that putting a __call__ method in standard folders
> would break a lot of DTML. Remember that a namespace lookup tries to
> execute the value before returning it. But don't take my word for it,
> add a __call__ method to ObjectManager and see what happe
Chris Withers wrote:
> Ah, so ZCallable is an inferior ZRenderable? *joke* :-)
I made it 'cause it's simpler. And a memory lapse made me forget about
Renderable. In fact I think ZCallable is a silly name. Actually the
base class ought to be in standard Zope, not a product. And it should
use t
Bill Anderson wrote:
> I believe he is talkin gabout the __init__ function checking to see if
> the .zexp has been imported, and if not, importing it for you. It's an
> idea I have kicked around, but haven't tried yet.
IIRC, the 'Distribution' tab creates all this for you...
It creates a binary
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > > What is needed is a new way of installing Zope stuff for the following
> > > categories:
> > > 1. Python Base Products (Like ZPatterns, PTKBase and TrackerBase)
> > > 2. Instantiatable Products (like TinyTables, Squishdot and Tracker)
> > >
Steve Alexander wrote:
> The __call__ method is what gets invoked when you call the method,
> either through the magic of or with "Catalog(client, namespace, args*)">.
Now you see, this is what confuses me...
renders that method, implying in my mind that
__call__ should render stuff adn retur
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Why I'm asking is 'cos it'd be really nice not to have to keep
> re-writing UI when there's perfectly good stuff available in the
> management interface, things like add forms, edit forms, etc...
>
> However, if you call these from anywhere else, they dump you in the
> m
Erik Enge wrote:
> > call, it won't redirect. So you should be able to achieve the same
> > results just by invoking manage_addImage without including the REQUEST
> > object.
>
> But I have to pass something with the REQUEST, or else it won't add the
> image, right?
This is the problem we've ex
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
> The
> local roles stuff is the ability to have a DataSkin get local role
> information from "local role providers", thus allowing rules-based local
> roles to exist/co-exist with the standard Zope persistently-managed local
> roles.
How does this fit in / compare / contr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> How hard would it be to add more of the called URL to the traceback?
>
> ... traceback ...
>
> Great, I know that I have not put product_number in as a cookie or a hidden
> value, and it could not be found by acquisition. It failed in rendering
> index_html. Bu
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> > I have an idea: the _objects attribute of ObjectManagers could include
> > a "configurable" flag, which would tell _checkId that the object can be
> > overridden.
>
> Shane,
>
> Is this what became the ConfigurableInstances thing at:
> http://w
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I have an idea: the _objects attribute of ObjectManagers could include
> a "configurable" flag, which would tell _checkId that the object can be
> overridden.
Shane,
Is this what became the ConfigurableInstances thing at:
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/ConfigurableI
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> P.S. I wouldn't mind if someone posted this as a HOWTO. :-)
Done :-)
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related l
My understanding is that the default __class_init__ gets called for you
automatically if you don't call it explicitly.
--jfarr
"Perl is worse than Python because people wanted it worse."
Larry Wall, 14 Oct 1998
- Original Message -
From: Jeff K. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PR
Hello,
Should I call default__class_init__ on all of my Python products that care
about permissions? Or are there some times when it is not required?
--Jeff
---
Jeff K. Hoffman 704.849.0731 x108
Chief Technology Officer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:50 PM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>>
>> At 11:09 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Patch opportunity, perhaps? :) Ty and I would do it, no problem.
Heck,
>> >> I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function, since Zope
doesn't
>>
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>
> At 11:09 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> >>
> >> Patch opportunity, perhaps? :) Ty and I would do it, no problem. Heck,
> >> I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function, since Zope doesn't
> >> pay attention to anything past the first line of the
At 11:09 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>
>> Patch opportunity, perhaps? :) Ty and I would do it, no problem. Heck,
>> I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function, since Zope doesn't
>> pay attention to anything past the first line of the "access" file...
>
>We would be mos
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>
> At 10:15 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> >Chris Withers wrote:
> >>
> >> "Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
> >> > Maybe, maybe not. I think perhaps the most compelling argument from
> >> > Digital Creations' viewpoint for having an expanded "access" file
> might be
>
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
> >You speak in the past tense. This is only a suggestion and a
> >possibility. It's not as important as some other feature requests.
> >
>
> Patch opportunity, perhaps? :) Ty and I would do it, no problem. Heck,
> I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function,
At 05:54 PM 7/19/00 +0300, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
>"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>
>> If what you want is default values, then just put them in a DataSkin
>> property sheet in the ZClass. Or, if using a Python class, implement them
>> as class attributes named "class_default_for_X". E.g.:
>
>I
At 10:15 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>Chris Withers wrote:
>>
>> "Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>> > Maybe, maybe not. I think perhaps the most compelling argument from
>> > Digital Creations' viewpoint for having an expanded "access" file
might be
>> > the simplification of the setup proce
In trying to find the "Quorum Based Replication" stuff I've found that
we have two ZEO wikis.
http://www.zope.org/Products/ZEO/Wiki/FrontPage
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZEO/FrontPage
Bleah.
Chris McDonough
Digital Creations
Publishers of Zope - http://www.zope.org
At 05:41 PM 7/19/00 +0300, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
>
>class ASPAccount(LoginUser, MemberMixin):
>
>def __init__(self, id, title=''):
>LoginUser.__init__(self, id)
>self.__dict__['_currentPayment'] = None
>self.__dict__['debt'] = Payment.Debt(0.0)
>self.__d
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
> >Doing self.__dict__['name'] = 'Rincewind' seems kinda ugly. Maybe newItem
> >should by default call a function on newly created objects, say __init? I
> >don't want to have to subclass Specialist (or in my case, LoginManager) each
> >time I want to this, since it's a
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 04:57:12PM +0900, Brian Takashi Hooper wrote:
> Hi Zopistas,
>
> For anyone that might know:
>
> Is there a particular reason that the User-Agent header is not part of
> the request data that ZServer sends in the environment to ZPublisher?
>
> It looks like the user agen
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> "Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
> > Maybe, maybe not. I think perhaps the most compelling argument from
> > Digital Creations' viewpoint for having an expanded "access" file might be
> > the simplification of the setup process for customers. And it would also
> > make it easier
At 12:42 PM 7/19/00 +0300, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
>I need to do initialize some properties of new instances of a DataSkin
>subclass - ASPAccount. However, I can't put this in __init__ since the
>object hasn't been stored at that point.
>
>Doing self.__dict__['name'] = 'Rincewind' seems k
(ZPatterns 0.4a5, Zope 2.2.0) If an agent raises an exception, you don't get
to see the traceback. Instead, the object is simply not added (if the
exception was in _objectAdded, donno what happens in _objectChanged). This
makes debugging agents basically impossible...
--
Itamar S.T. [EMAIL PR
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Jephte CLAIN wrote:
> I have the scenario where a user can edit *its* data but not other
> users's data, unless he has a special role. however, the method used to
> edit one's data is the same.
> So I make sure inside the edit_data method that the user has the
> adequate permi
Hello,
is it possible for a single method, under Zope 2.1.6, to have several
permissions? ie
__ac_permission__ = (
('edit my data', 'edit_data'),
('edit others\'s data', 'edit_data'),
)
I have the scenario where a user can edit *its* data but not other
users's data, unless he has a spec
I need to do initialize some properties of new instances of a DataSkin
subclass - ASPAccount. However, I can't put this in __init__ since the
object hasn't been stored at that point.
Doing self.__dict__['name'] = 'Rincewind' seems kinda ugly. Maybe newItem
should by default call a function on
Hi Zopistas,
For anyone that might know:
Is there a particular reason that the User-Agent header is not part of
the request data that ZServer sends in the environment to ZPublisher?
It looks like the user agent can also be provided to Zope's request
object just by adding a line for 'user-agent'
33 matches
Mail list logo
