Hi,
This weekend I did some work on python scripts and found some things which
suprised me, can someone enlighten me on this why these 'strange' things are
needed? :
1. When calling a method from a python script you've to do this :
(assume x is the value to pass and name is a parameter of
From: Joachim Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is true in the ZODB, but can be complicated by acquisition. If an
object can acquire itself, it can cause issues. Plus it becomes
difficult to know whether objects are clones or just identical
instances, although this can be mitigated by
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 05:42 PM 5/11/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I'm not quite clear on how exactly you suggest mapping from RDMBS -
ZODB. There's a *significant* (IMHO) impedance mismatch between ZODB's
arbitrarily identified variably structured single
Joachim Werner wrote:
Probably I'm daft because it is Friday night, but AFAIK ZODB and most
OODB's
store an object only once, keyed by its object id. The rest is just
references
through that oid, so objects that belong to more than one container can be
added to all these containers
From: Joachim Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is true in the ZODB, but can be complicated by acquisition. If an
object can acquire itself, it can cause issues. Plus it becomes
difficult to know whether objects are clones or just identical
instances, although this can be mitigated by
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I'm telling you there's a lot more you can do with the code that makes
snip
The next thing to do is to write a fishbowl proposal.
This sounds cool but made my head hurt :-S
Can you try and bring this back down to the level of us mere mortals by
explaining how your OR
P.S.: Shane, have you developed Symlinks any further? I think they could be
extremely useful. I tried out the initial release and liked it, except for
the fact that the symlinks looked EXACTLY like real ones, so they can be
very irritating ...
I'm not sure what to do with symlinks.
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I'm telling you there's a lot more you can do with the code that makes
snip
The next thing to do is to write a fishbowl proposal.
This sounds cool but made my head hurt :-S
Can you try and bring this back down to the level of us mere
Shane Hathaway wrote:
One would define an ObjectMappingSchema whose job it is to store and
retrieve objects of a specific type and in a specific location. It
would usually grab a database connection object to do its work. When
loading, it would perform a query then manually put
I think this is a great idea! I would definetely like to use and contribute
to this effort. Having this kind of flexibily would be fantastic.
After demonstratable Python code is working I would request that usability
issues (UI Schema mapper, data migration/schema evolution tools, ZEO
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
One would define an ObjectMappingSchema whose job it is to store and
retrieve objects of a specific type and in a specific location. It
would usually grab a database connection object to do its work. When
loading, it would perform a query
Shane Hathaway wrote:
ZPatterns implements storage logic on the application level.
Applications have to be aware of (in fact they have to be centered
around) ZPatterns. This alternate approach keeps storage logic
independent of application logic. It lets you take any code written for
the
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
ZPatterns implements storage logic on the application level.
Applications have to be aware of (in fact they have to be centered
around) ZPatterns. This alternate approach keeps storage logic
independent of application logic. It lets you
Hi All,
As someone pointed out on #zope, it is possible to view folder contents
using a webdav client as an anonymous user.
I.e. download cadaver (http://www.webdav.org/cadaver/), open
yourzopeserver:8080 and do ls. Then decide if you want anyone to be
able to access this. Eventhough hiding
At 12:26 PM 5/14/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
One would define an ObjectMappingSchema whose job it is to store and
retrieve objects of a specific type and in a specific location. It
would usually grab a database connection object to
Casey Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not arguing necessarily for SQL as a query language for the ZODB.
Although it is an accepted standard, but not a perfect one by any means
especially for OODBs. Its appeal lies mainly in the high level of
community familiarity and the plethora of
[Joachim Werner]
As most of you might have recognized, there is a very active thread
(actually two interwoven ones) about RO-mapping etc. going on on zope-dev.
I'd be very happy if someone could wrap up the stuff from there on the
SmartObjects list. ;-)
[Albert]
Thanks for the pointer. As I read
[Karl Anderson]
Casey Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not arguing necessarily for SQL as a query language for the ZODB.
Although it is an accepted standard, but not a perfect one by any means
especially for OODBs. Its appeal lies mainly in the high level of
community familiarity and
Now, it may be useful to provide a management interface for defining the
schema mapping. I haven't approached that yet; AFAICT this is where the
work done on SmartObjects and DBObjects would be very useful. Initially
I was planning for people to code the mapping purely in Python so we
My thought on this, is that you will be forced to explicitly consider the
nature of this relationship and its storage at the application level. If
you write explicitly for ZODB, you might use a BTree, for example. Or
perhaps you'd have some kind of global container for the Tasks, with a
My thought on this, is that you will be forced to explicitly consider the
nature of this relationship and its storage at the application level. If
you write explicitly for ZODB, you might use a BTree, for example. Or
perhaps you'd have some kind of global container for the Tasks, with a
On Mon, 14 May 2001, The Doctor What wrote:
What's going on? Is this a Mozilla problem?
Yes.
If so, why is lynx
doing the same?
Because lynx is broken too.
How should I go about trouble shooting it?
The problem is the client does not provide the right Basic authentication
credentials
Hi all,
If you're concerned or curious, please review this proposal on the fishbowl
regarding adding a default role to Zope named 'Authenticated':
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/AuthenticatedRole
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL
23 matches
Mail list logo
