Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
But release often is a BITCH for software configuration management.
Good for developers, bad for deployers.
Why?
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross
Brad Clements wrote:
But the passive port range patch didn't make it into 2.6
Do you have CVS access?
No. I emailed both sets of patches to .. Brian (?) at the same time.
Suggest you apply for it. DIY is the best way of making sure stuff gets in :-)
cheers,
Chris
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:32:59 -0700
Jeffrey P Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 04:22 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
It what world do you live, and can I move there?
You miss the point ;-)
The flurry to get features into a 'stable'
Brian,
I have been an active user of Zope for nearly two years. My current
position affords me the opportunity to finally give something back to the
community. I work for NOAA and Web Services will be a critical piece of our
web architecture strategy this coming year. Our branch is located in
I got a hacked together version of WebServices sort of working at
ActiveState at the around the same time Brian was working on that code. I
think its still working, but its no where near complete:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Syndication. Unfortunately you'd have to
smile sweetly at
What I am able to offer is 1-2 fulltime software engineers for as long as
it
takes to do this right. I have read your proposal (just after you
released
it last year) and thought it very well done. I like the implementation
you
describe and agree with your proposal 100%. The time frame that
Andy,
I wondered about that. I have been following some of the dialog on the Zope
3 dev list but it is unclear to me its status. We (my office) would like to
have the Web Services capability by July/August time frame (earlier if
possible), so don't know if that falls in line with a stable Zope
