Hi,
i have the strange feeling that somebody forgot to include the
AccessControl.ZopeGuard.safe_builtins for DTML.
See DT_Utils.py around line 56 and the corresponding imports as well as
the definition of safe_builtins in ZopeGuard.py.
Could someone verify this?
Cheers,
Christian
--
I have to agree with the recommendations of never running Zope with the OS
Python. In fact, I usually don't even get it to work, since the OS Python
have a tendency to not include modules included in the standard Python
distribution, or behave weridly in some other way. For example, OpenBSD's
Dennis Allison wrote:
Tried to do the former, but Python 2.3.1 would not build on RH9 with
significant brain surgery. Updated RH9 to the bleeding edge and got
things mostly working except for some subsystems adn supporting systems
which use threading and would not work under the new threading
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
i have the strange feeling that somebody forgot to include the
AccessControl.ZopeGuard.safe_builtins for DTML.
See DT_Utils.py around line 56 and the corresponding imports as well as
the definition of safe_builtins in ZopeGuard.py.
Could someone verify this?
Could you
I want to make the zope.interface (Zope 3 Interfaces) package
available on the Zope 2 head (aka Zope 2.8). I propose to add
lib/python/zope3 as a container for zope 3 packages. This new
directory will be added to the path used by Zope 2.
A separate directory is needed because there are packages
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
i have the strange feeling that somebody forgot to include the
AccessControl.ZopeGuard.safe_builtins for DTML.
See DT_Utils.py around line 56 and the corresponding imports as well as
the definition of safe_builtins in ZopeGuard.py.
Could someone
